Naomi Klein Despises Capitalism

December 2nd, 2007 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Crooks and Liars has a video up of Naomi Klein. She just wrote a book called “Disaster Capitalism.” In it she basically tries to convince the reader that capitalism is bad. Nicole Belle agrees with Klein and wants everyone to read it.

I haven’t read the book and I don’t intend to do so either. Naomi Klein is a socialist anti-globalization activist. For those who haven’t noticed yet: socialism has proven to be a disaster. As such, whenever you think about economics and want to get someone’s advise, a socialist is the last person you should turn to. Better yet: even if there’s no one available for advise other than the socialist and anti-globalist, then ask no one.

Having said that, it’s important to see who listens to people like Klein and who doesn’t. Klein and people like her are blind. All the evidence indicates that globalization is actually good for everyone. Every now and then Klein and people like her talk about Africa, how globalization is destroying Africa. Funny enough Africans disagree. They don’t want less globalization, they want more globalization. They want Western countries to open their border for their agricultural products. And they’re right.

Note to Naomi: that’s globalization in action.

India: India is becoming richer and richer. It’s economy continues to grow. Less people are poor now than they were a couple of years ago. Why? Globalization.

These people, anti-globalization activists and anti-capitalists, will destroy the economy of every country they control.

Of course, they don’t care about poverty and the poor, they care about their socialist agenda – justice to them means that everyone should be equally poor. That’s what they’re trying to do, and that’s what their policies will accomplish. Naomi Klein isn’t an exception to that rule.

It’s interesting to see, though, that Nicole Belle (since she supports Klein) once again proves that American liberals are many things, but liberal isn’t one of them. Liberalism – true liberalism – celebrates the free market. For the liberal, the individual is more important than the group. For Belle and the American liberal movement, however, that’s not so. They aren’t liberals, they’re socialists. Moderate socialists, perhaps, but socialists nonetheless.

In other words: Klein and Belle remind me why European liberals and conservatives have to hope that American liberals will never truly come to power. Obama and Clinton are ok, but the hard-left – represented in American politics by people like Kucinich – is anti-economic freedom.

Instead of attacking economic freedom and capitalism, perhaps Naomi and her merry bunch should apologize for the disaster their co-ideologues brought on the world (Soviet Union, Western Germany, North Korea, etc.). We shouldn’t be talking about how evil capitalism is, they shouldn’t open the offense, they should be in defense mode since they’re the ones who truly brought disaster and poverty on millions of people.

Note: just to prevent people from falling all over themselves criticizing me / this post; I’m not talking about all liberals, I’m talking about far-left kind, as embodied in people like Klein, Kucinich, the anti-globalization movement, etc.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. cdeegan
    December 3rd, 2007 at 06:27
    Reply | Quote | #1

    jeez I just watched that video, I had to check twice to make sure that it wasn’t satire from The Onion. The comments at Crooks and Liars are amusing also, most of them seem to think that Klein is bashing Tom Friedman.

  2. Chris
    December 3rd, 2007 at 10:08
    Reply | Quote | #2

    You wrote this big long post without reading the book?!

    “In it she basically tries to convince the reader that capitalism is bad.”What?!

    Don’t insult your readers. Klein is critical of a very specific form of capitalism – what she labels “Disaster capitalism”. She makes some compelling points. I don’t agree with everything she says, but she does try to back her points up with hard facts.

    For example, the economic liberalisation of Chile and Argentina were disasters for the vast majority of citizens. Chile is still one of the most unequal countries in the world.

    Please read the book before you go on any further.

  3. Nomen Nescio
    January 1st, 2008 at 19:02
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Yet another inadequate "blogger" who knows nothing about political theory and get’s his opinions from the editorial pages of his favourite newspaper…some news for you, socialism does not equate communism….they are two different things….stop perpetuating the myth that the United States has been trying to sell for the last 60 years.  Socialist theory is a viable theoretical trend and one which as worked quite well througout the world when implemented under democratic goverment….do some research before you open your mouth and type it down.

  4. Robert E.
    January 1st, 2008 at 19:31
    Reply | Quote | #4

    << Socialist theory is a viable theoretical trend >>

    Spoken like a true academic (even though I have no reason to believe you are one).  Talk about meaningless circular reasoning. **** theory is a viable theoretical trend? LOL

    << which as worked quite well througout the world >> 

    That depends on how you define "quite well", I suppose.  If you mean that it has succeeded in taking by force from the productive members of society and resdistributing to the non-productive,  I would say that "exceptionally well" would be a far better description.

    << when implemented under democratic goverment >>

    Of course! Nothing else but mob rule would work for socialism. Peter will vote to rob Paul every day of the week, especially if he can leave the dirty work to his Government.

  5. Robert E.
    January 1st, 2008 at 19:33
    Reply | Quote | #5

    Oops.  What happened to the post to which I was respondig?

  6. Tully
    January 1st, 2008 at 20:20
    Reply | Quote | #6

    For example, the economic liberalisation of Chile and Argentina were disasters for the vast majority of citizens. Chile is still one of the most unequal countries in the world.

    That’s just not true, Chris, and I challenge you to prove it with empirical measures that demonstrate your claims. Peru has improved considerably in both GDP per capita and reduced pvoerty levels, and the problems of Argentina are directly traceable to incompetent government fiscal policies (leading to massive external debt) and endemic corruption. "Economic liberalization" is not what hurt them. Incompetent government did.

    Klein is just as talented at economic analysis as she is at brain surgery. Her polemic is just that–polemic, of a an ideological nature, that ignores soundeevidence to stretch for the desired conclusions.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.