Guest Post – Ali Eteraz

December 5th, 2007 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Our fourth guest blogger is an Islamic thinker, well known throughout the blogosphere and outside it: Ali Eteraz. Ali picks us where Shadi Hamid left off: will an Islamic reformation ever come?

I was recently commissioned to write a seven part series on Islamic reform at the Guardian and thought I might jump into the discussion on whether the Islamic reformation will ever come.

The answer is that the roots of Islamic reform — dissent, criticism and re-evaluation of the orthodoxy — have been going on for a long time. In fact, the Islamic equivalent of the protestant reformation has already happened, and the results haven’t been pretty (as was the case with the actual Protestant reformation). While there has been some attempt by Muslim clerics to reassert their control by way of an Islamic counter-reformation, it is a case of too little too late. Instead, Islam finds itself moving beyond an Islamic enlightenment, characterized by high levels of individualism and characterized by a rejection of traditional authority structures. This individualist push could have been beneficial but for the twin evils of colonialism and rise of political Islam. The Islamists of the 20th century found the Muslim world hankering for direction and utilized a number of propagandist and geopolitical tricks to take control, all of which now requires a counter-movement to create a Muslim “left” which is anti-theocratic and pro-liberty.

This “limited leftism” — since by the standard of western leftism it is conservative — can be described as a sort of Muslim secularism. Once political parties around the Muslim world start adopting its basic premises — that the best way to solve human problems is through politics and not religion — it will create a “post-Islamist” push (one that has already started). Only if, and when, this post-Islamist push is successful will genuinely secular groups in the Muslim world start to raise their heads.

It should be clarified that this discussion is limited to “Islamic reform” i.e. Islam centric ways of creating equality and freedom in the Muslim majority world. If you want to discuss the presence of secular, entirely non-theistic ways of creating equality and freedom in the Muslim world (Marxism, anarchism, socialism, atheism), that is an entirely different discussion, and shouldn’t be confused with Islamic reform.

Ali Eteraz is a writer, blogger and columnist for the Guardian.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.