Democrats Break with Liberal Base
“The Senate today began debate on a FISA bill that would overhaul the rules for electronic surveillance and provide retroactive immunity for telecom companies that participated in the Bush administration’s illegal spying efforts,” Think Progress reports.
Ten people voted against cloture on the telecom immunity bill. Newshoggers lists them: Boxer (D-CA), Brown (D-OH), Cantwell (D-WA), Cardin (D-MD), Dodd (D-CT), Feingold (D-WI), Harkin (D-IA), Kerry (D-MA), Menendez (D-NJ), Wyden (D-OR).
Wondering who weren’t present? Obama, Clinton, Biden and McCain all weren’t there. Funny that.
Instead of voting Obama decided to release a statement in support of Dodd, but that doesn’t accomplish much of course (as was his intention: got to keep clean hands).
Daily Kos has more.
It’s interesting to see that the liberal base once again isn’t happy with the Democrats. Cernig writes, for instance: “Over at TP, commenters are calling this as the bitter end of progressive hopes that the Democratic party is ever going to be more than Republican-Lite. I have to say I agree with that.” After that he goes on to talk about how Tony Blair ruined Labor, which is a bit of a distortion of history of course since if Blair would’ve done what the old Laborites would’ve wanted him to do, Britain would be in big trouble.
The point about the Democrats, though, stands. If one doesn’t agree with Cernig, then at least it makes clear how fed up the liberal base is.
Another unhappy liberal is Kyle E. Moore.
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
Comments are closed.
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.
if Blair would’ve done what the old Laborites would’ve wanted him to do, Britain would be in big trouble.
A happy conservative myth that, based on a misunderstanding of what social democratism is all about. Brown was the financial guru and it was Brown’s economic successes that kept Blair in power. All based on Anthony Crosland’s seminal works. There’s good reason to believe Crosland would have been happy with Brown as Chancellor, in the main. As have I been.
However, Brown has followed Blair in pandering to the lowest denominator of fear to garner votes and so has trampled on civil liberties which were always more sacrosanct to Labour than they were to Tories. (Witness Thatcher’s legislation against lawful assembly, which was opposed by the late, great John Smith among others.) His pandering to Saudi bribers and willingness to accept cash for honours from rich donors were also betrayals of Smith, who held the door open for him before his early death because he believed the Blairite panaceas. Likewise, they betrayed the principles of Labour.
Michael, I was involved in politics when the Blairites were putting together their dynasties using student parties as a springboard to local councils and then the party as a whole. I knew McConnell, Connarty, Ritchie and others as students and my uncle, a Labour old-hand, introduced me to several others including Brown. There wasn’t one of them had a principle except power for power’s sake. They were why I left the Labour party at an early age.
Regards, C