Texas Just Loves Executions

December 26th, 2007 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

OK, I admit, the headline is a tad bit inflammatory, but being an opponent of the death penalty and considering the fact that Texas is responsible for 60% of all executions in the US on a yearly basis, I think it’s not overly inflammatory.

This is the first time in history. “Over the past three decades, the proportion of executions nationwide performed in Texas has held relatively steady, averaging 37 percent. Only once before, in 1986, has the state accounted for even a slight majority of the executions, and that was in a year with 18 executions nationwide,” which decreases its significance a bit.

Anyway, of last year’s 42 executions, 26 took place in Texas. “The remaining 16 were spread across nine other states, none of which executed more than three people.”

Will the state ‘monopolize’ the death penalty? “David R. Dow, a law professor at the University of Houston who has represented death-row inmates” says yes: “The reason that Texas will end up monopolizing executions is because every other state will eliminate it de jure, as New Jersey did, or de facto, as other states have.”

The main question, of course, is why is Texas leading the pack… by far? Richard C. Dieter, the executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center said that [t]here’s almost an aggressiveness about carrying out executions” in the state. What’s more, Professor Dow also explained: “Execution dates here, uniquely, are set by individual district attorneys.” This means that when a district attorney is a great proponent of the death penalty, you will automatically have more executions.

The good news, for those who oppose capital punishment that is, is that the number of executions in Texas have decreased. “In the 10 years ending in 2004, Texas condemned an average of 34 prisoners each year — about 15 percent of the national total. In the last three years, as the number of death sentences nationwide dropped significantly, from almost 300 in 1998 to about 110 in 2007, the number in Texas has dropped along with it, to 13 — or 12 percent,” the New York Times reports.

Hopefully the trend will continue.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Xel
    December 26th, 2007 at 20:16
    Reply | Quote | #1

    We do not have the capacity for investigations, procedures and insights into the mindset of criminals to justify the use of the DP. I am not against it under any conditions, just now.

  2. Interested
    December 26th, 2007 at 21:45
    Reply | Quote | #2

    the problem with life sentences is they are often not afforded the same level of judicial review that Death Penalty sentences are. 

    That equals life sentences for innocents.

    This is not advocating Death Penalty sentences (although I support them) rather it is indicative of a judicial problem in it’s entirety.

  3. Tully
    December 26th, 2007 at 22:39
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Yep, Texs is one state where they believe that if you sentence someone to death, you should actually carry out the sentence.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.