Giuliani Campaign Official Goes Too Far

December 28th, 2007 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

My God:

John Deady, Co-Chair for New Hampshire’s Veterans for Rudy:

…(Rudy Giuliani has) the knowledge and judgment to attack one of the most difficult problems in current history. And that is the rise of the Muslims. And make no mistake about it, this hasn’t happened for a thousand years. These people are very, very dedicated. They’re also very smart, in their own way. And we need to keep the feet to the fire and keep pressing these people ‘til we defeat them or chase them back to their caves, or in other words, get rid of them.

Chase them back to their caves? “The rise of the Muslims”? Now, as Greg Sargent points out, Giuliani supporters shouldn’t even try to defend Deady / Giuliani by saying that Dead was talking about extremists: he wasn’t. He was – very clearly – talking about all Muslims.

This is worth doing more research about: how many Giuliani staffers think like this?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Chris
    December 28th, 2007 at 23:12
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Uh ohh!

  2. libertarian
    December 28th, 2007 at 23:26
    Reply | Quote | #2

    This is about what I would expect from Giuliani, his staff, and his supporters.

    He can’t really run on the tax cuts, because at the same time he grew the government, ran up some debts, and didn’t complete the full spectrum of "small government" which is what tax cut Republicans want.

    He can’t really run on religious issues or as a social conservative… 

    He just has the war, and to sell that against declining public opinion, he needs fear and hyperbole and racism/xenophobia.

  3. sashal
    December 29th, 2007 at 00:27
    Reply | Quote | #3

    wasn’t Jonah book about him ?
    nah, my bad, about liberals-fascists

  4. Rudi666
    December 29th, 2007 at 00:28
    Reply | Quote | #4

    MvdG – I listened to your blogradio show and loved the part about Rudy and Judicial Watch.

    1.  Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY):  In addition to her long and sordid ethics record, Senator Hillary Clinton took a lot of heat in 2007 – and rightly so – for blocking the release her official White House records.  Many suspect these records contain a treasure trove of information related to her role in a number of serious Clinton-era scandals.  Moreover, in March 2007, Judicial Watch filed an ethics complaint against Senator Clinton for filing false financial disclosure forms with the U.S. Senate (again).  And Hillary’s top campaign contributor, Norman Hsu, was exposed as a felon and a fugitive from justice in 2007.  Hsu pleaded guilt to one count of grand theft for defrauding investors as part of a multi-million dollar Ponzi scheme.5.  Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R-NY):  Giuliani came under fire in late 2007 after it was discovered the former New York mayor’s office “billed obscure city agencies for tens of thousands of dollars in security expenses amassed during the time when he was beginning an extramarital relationship with future wife Judith Nathan in the Hamptons…”  ABC News also reported that Giuliani provided Nathan with a police vehicle and a city driver at taxpayer expense.  All of this news came on the heels of the federal indictment on corruption charges of Giuliani’s former Police Chief and business partner Bernard Kerik, who pleaded guilty in 2006 to accepting a $165,000 bribe in the form of renovations to his Bronx apartment from a construction company attempting to land city contracts. 6.  Governor Mike Huckabee (R-AR):  Governor Huckabee enjoyed a meteoric rise in the polls in December 2007, which prompted a more thorough review of his ethics record.  According to The Associated Press:  “[Huckabee’s] career has also been colored by 14 ethics complaints and a volley of questions about his integrity, ranging from his management of campaign cash to his use of a nonprofit organization to subsidize his income to his destruction of state computer files on his way out of the governor’s office.”  And what was Governor Huckabee’s response to these ethics allegations?  Rather than cooperating with investigators, Huckabee sued the state ethics commission twice and attempted to shut the ethics process down.

    Thanks for the info. Engagement with your enemy(Hungary, USSR and Tito’s Jugoslavia) works better than isolation(NORK and Cuba).

  5. Xel
    December 29th, 2007 at 00:42
    Reply | Quote | #5

    Bunch of honest, upstanding, meritocratic and straight-shooting people, these establishment candidates…

    As for the undefeatably idiotic Giuliani supporter (I’d call him a douchebag but I am myself a somewhat elastic container of lukewarm water, so what does on do?) I can only wonder when Giuliani will tell him "We cna no longr b BFF’s cuz u sux", and if people will have the guts to demand this break-up.

    Of course, Huck hasn’t been asked to answer to his previous statements on women and non-heteros, so maybe their supporters don’t think their dear leaders should have to deal with rhetoric that non-sipporters find offensive or even threatening. This bother me greatly. Is McCain really the only alternative? Well, he is far far far better than Bush.

  6. Bill W
    December 29th, 2007 at 17:42
    Reply | Quote | #6

    Xel – I like your description of the human body I suppose – funny. 

    I think Rudy has a lot to offer, even forgetting his foreign policy stance – He did two what were considered impossible jobs in his time – going after organized crime as a prosecutor and doing a great job at it, and then cleaning up and making NYC work again as a city.  That to me makes me think he is the only person running on both sides that can provide the leadership to make the US government work.  Our bureacracies are out of control. 

    Couple that with how we have already seen him act as a leader in crisis, and his firm foreign policy, and I would have to say he is the best in the mix.   However, I think he has enough close encounters with skeletons that the Dems may be able to pick him off (although Hillary & Bill had far more that they have not been held accountable to)

    John McCain a close second from leadership under fire and foreign policy, but he has never run anything.  I love the guy and if he is the nominee, I’d support him 110%.    I have been where the bullets fly and seen the two types of leadership styles in action – and you never know what you are going to get until the real – and I mean life & death- pressure is on.  We know how these two react – they go towards the fire and lead – vs. what we can only suspect about the others. 

    The rest of the Republicans & Democrats have not much to offer in the key areas.

  7. Bill W
    December 29th, 2007 at 17:45
    Reply | Quote | #7

    Sorry, I got sidelined by reading the comments, from commenting on the real subject – that guy is a douche – either he thinks all Muslims are bad or he is not smart enough to make the distinction when being quoted.  Either way – out the door with him.

  8. Larry
    December 30th, 2007 at 04:16
    Reply | Quote | #8

    This is just like the comments Hillary’s surrogates level against Obama.

    Sling the mud through a surrogate, then appear appalled when confronted, have the surrogate issue a phony resignation but the stain of the verbage is still in the air.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.