Comments on: Fox Vetoes Ron Paul

By: Chris

Chris — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:41:52 +0000

If you truely wanna know what is meant by "new world order" just google BILDERBERG. Even Wolfowitz joked about it before he entered the circle.
But it is true that most conspiracies do not work so well- over time leaks will find its way out- In Germany there was a cartel (sign posting on autobahns) which lasted almost 50 years. When the old folks passed away their heirs split in a brawl…

By: David

David — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:13:24 +0000

“FOX cheating Ron Paul vindicates those of us who have said the CFR agenda/New World Order control the press.”

If they did a poll I would guess that 9 out of 10 conspiracy theorists support Ron Paul.

I suppose next thing we’ll hear is that Elvis has given Paul his backing in his 2007 Christmas message….

By: Kyle

Kyle — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:53:48 +0000

The Main Stream Media has blacked out Ron Paul for the last week; even giving more attention to those polling below him.

FOX cheating Ron Paul vindicates those of us who have said the CFR agenda/New World Order control the press.

The Cnstitution hangs by a thread; pray for His help; then do something about it.

The Media blackout will help push the fourth party run by Paul; now he needs a real deal Veep. Bloomberg (CFR) is running third party.

By: Tobias S.

Tobias S. — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 06:38:30 +0000

ok, in addition to all the online/scientific poll arguments. And the unfair media arguments. What about the legalities behind current MSM and What has been done to improve Touch Screen Voting...there is very shocking evidence in this article. http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/cgi-bin/blogs/voices.php/2007/12/29/p22182

By: Bill W

Bill W — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 04:11:34 +0000

I’m not playing word games, I clicked through all of the links above and it appears Fox was going to have a debate on the 8th that got canceled – with no mention of Paul being excluded, and now ABC is going to have a debate on the 6th – doesn’t say a round table it says a debate, and it says nothing about Paul being excluded from that. Nothing about Fox doing anything – so what is the outrage about?

And if you have seen any of my previous posts, you would see that I am dubious about ALL of the polls – I don’t believe any of them are accurate, but find it curious that the Paul backers want to diss all of the scientific ones but put so much stock in an online poll. We’ll see when an election actually happens, which has to wait for New Hampshire. Iowa’s caucuses are maybe a step above an internet poll for accuracy and impeachability.

By: J707

J707 — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 03:55:01 +0000

The playing of simple word games here is the most base and laughably pathetic way to detract the legitimate complaints against Fox’s exclusion of Paul…from the FORUM. lol

No, there wont be a "DEBATE" on the 6th…there will be a ROUNDTABLE FORUM with all the Republican candidates EXCEPT Ron Paul.

Dont split hairs to divert attention away from what is happening; there IS going to be a FORUM WITH ALL REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES IN NEW HAMPSHIRE, AND PAUL WAS EXCLUDED BY FOX NEWS.
And to people like Bill W. you can believe any poll you want- that you or anyone else for that matter values SOMEONE ELSE’S opinion so strongly is your problem.
Just consider that the "scientific polls" being shown to you every day on major media channels draw their sampling only from those who voted Republican (as in, for Bush a second time) in the 2004 election.
So if you believe that what USA Today called a "record low registered Republican turnout of 6.6%" in 2004 is indicative of who will be voting for who in this election then I supposed thats also your problem.

I’ll be voting for whose ideas most closely match my own, not who the media tells me is "viable" or who Bush’s most avid (and arguably insane, if they really voted for him a second time) supporters are now cheering for.

By: Bill W

Bill W — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:14:34 +0000

Let me get this straight – Ron Paul may or may not be excluded from a debate that is not even happening is what it looks like reading and clicking through a few of the links here – and for that Fox News is like Nazi’s, Bill O’reilly should be hung, they are a "corrupt corporate propaganda machine", whose "strong powers of fox is only strong if people care to listen" and we are supposed to believe an online poll because RP is leading but disregard every other poll because they are flawed. About sum it up?

By: Michael van der Galien

Michael van der Galien — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:03:15 +0000

No, no Michael, you misunderstood my post. By four walling it myself, I was trying to relieve you of any effort on this. I wasn’t demanding anything from you. Quite the opposite, I figure we might now as well let it be and move on to something else.

People don’t comment on it, cause we’ve got a "stick to the topic of the post" rule. In other words, if people would respond, chances are that after two or three comments me or one of the editors would cut debate short.

And OK: happy that’s clear I interpreted it somewhat different. Srry bout that.

By: Robert E.

Robert E. — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:54:28 +0000

No, no Michael, you misunderstood my post. By four walling it myself, I was trying to relieve you of any effort on this. I wasn’t demanding anything from you. Quite the opposite, I figure we might now as well let it be and move on to something else.

By: Michael van der Galien

Michael van der Galien — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:49:26 +0000

Robert; perhaps some patience is in order? I’m a blogger, not someone who posts on demand.