Huckabee Strategist Wants to Attack Romney

January 3rd, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Ed Rollins, the newly appointed Huckabee campaign chairman and famous for throwing with mud, playing it dirty, going negative, is quoted by the Washington Post as saying: “What I have to do is make sure that my anger with a guy like Romney, whose teeth I want to knock out, doesn’t get in the way of my thought process.”

Excuse me? “Whose teeth I want to knock out”? And this guy is on Huckabee campaign, more, the chairman of the former preacher’s campaign? There’s nothing even remotely Christian about saying something like that.

Mitt Romney’s reaction is an instant classic though: “don’t touch the hair.”

You gotta love that one.

Whatever else you want to say about these elections, it’s war alright.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. C Stanley
    January 3rd, 2008 at 21:03
    Reply | Quote | #1

    It looks to me like Rollins is setting up a good cop/bad cop routine with himself and Huckabee. Rollins is making all kinds of noise about negative campaigning, Huckabee nixes it, and the outcome they seem to hope for is that they’re able to mudsling but have Huckabee immune to charges of doing that. It’s pretty silly, and so transparent that I think anyone with any political savvy can see right through it- but I guess the question is whether the bulk of voters who aren’t very interested in politics will examine it closely enough to see through it too.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.