Will Thompson Drop Out Part II?

January 3rd, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Someone who works for Fred Thompson told me that the report at Politico “shocked” him and that he had not “heard any rumors about dropping out after Iowa.”

The source went on to say that they’re putting much time and attention in doing well in Wyoming and South Carolina.

As someone famous once said, accounts of my death have greatly been exaggerated (paraphrasing here).

It seems that Thompson isn’t thinking about getting out of the race after Iowa, which I consider to be good news for American conservatives.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Winghunter
    January 3rd, 2008 at 19:09
    Reply | Quote | #1

    This "story" isn’t about the possibility of a candidate dropping out for no valid reason.

    This story is about self-proclaimed pundits who blatantly fabricated anonymous sources within the candidates inner circle in order to damage his chances of doing well in Iowa.

    This story is about a couple of low-lifes who willingly sink to the bottom of depravity, along with any other "reporter" who announces feigned agreement,  to push their own political agenda.  
    THIS is a story of a concerted effort to subvert the American election process.

    Now, THERE’S a story!

  2. Gary Gross
    January 3rd, 2008 at 19:57
    Reply | Quote | #2

    As I said here, Fred isn’t getting out anytime soon. That indeed is good news for conservatives. It doesn’t bother me that that news is giving the Mitt Romneys & Mike Huckabees of the world a world-class case of heartburn.

  3. HT Springer
    January 21st, 2008 at 19:21
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Fred Thompson needs to get out of the way.  He touts himself as a conservative, yet he is nothing more than a tired old "go-with-the-flow" Washington beaurocrat.  What did he do in the Senate?  Nothing.  He’s too lazy to be president. 

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.