Huckabee: Real Republicans Vote for Me

January 4th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The video below the fold is interesting for a couple of reasons. One of them is that Huckabee once again points out that many of those who vote for him are value voters. That’s obvious. But what’s more interesting is that he, as AllahPundit notes, starts to talk about economic issues in a way that sounds (reasonably) acceptable to fiscal conservatives. He’s talking about small businesses: if he continues to play that card, he’ll do better in many other states than most anticipated.

His way to help small businesses is right out of the fiscally conservative playbook (to which fiscal conservatives – like myself – can only say “Amen”): less regulation, less taxation and less litigation.

Awesome one-liner: “small business is nothing more than a big business that hasn’t gotten big yet.”

However, although he may talk about small businesses, and although that may appeal to quite some fiscal conservatives, he continues to sound like an economic Populist which will turn these same voters off. Comparing himself to Reagan is quite ludicrous in this regard IMO. Having said that, Republicans shouldn’t try to find a second Reagan, they should try to find a First Whomever.

He also said something that will, I’m sure, anger quite some conservatives. “Real Republicans aren’t unhappy with why I won in Iowa.”

Pardon me? Real Republicans? How’s that? I know some real Republicans who truly don’t want Huckabee to win. If he wants to unite the party he has to stop referring to people who oppose him as the “big business” or “establishment” or “not real Republicans.”

Then again, that approach is of course in line with his populism. If he stops doing that, his populist message will be weakened.

As they say, never change a winning team.

Here’s the video, watch it, more of my thoughts below it.

Once again he presents himself in a fantastic manner. When you listen to the guy you can’t help but like him. That’s his main strength, of course.

If he drops the attitude somewhat, he may be able to unite the party more than he’s been giving credit for. Sadly for him and for the GOP I don’t think that he’ll break with populism any time soon.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. C Stanley
    January 4th, 2008 at 18:46
    Reply | Quote | #1

    It’s a tough line, to define yourself as an anti-establishment candidate without ramping up that rhetoric so much that you alienate those who favor the establishment (or the investor class, or what have you.)

    But I really do think that our current climate calls for this kind of change. Voters in ‘06 clearly saw that DC had become a cesspool of corruption and special interests, so there’s a strong current of ‘throw the bums out’ mentality that Huck is tapping into.

    BTW, I’ve predicted that he’ll start presenting his economic platform in a way that’s more palatable to paleoconservatives and I think this is the start of it.  He’s absolutely right about the small business issues, and he needs to keep hammering on those topics.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.