Huge Turnout in New Hampshire

January 8th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

It looks like today will be a huge day for Barack Obama. Why? Because all records will be broken today in New Hampshire with regards to voter turnout. Why’s that good news for the Hope from Chicago? Because the more people vote, the more likely it is that many of these voters are independents. And independents favor Obama over Clinton by quite a big margin.

As Ed Morrissey points out, Obama is doing great among both independents and younger voters (I suspect there’s somewhat of an overlap there though). “If the youth vote gets activated,” Ed rightfully writes, ” it means a big day for Obama and a potentially embarrassing finish for the long-time Democratic frontrunner” Hillary Clinton.

Normally a huge turnout would also be great news for John McCain, but the situation may be different this time around: if New Hampshire’s independents vote for Obama en masse, they can’t vote for McCain as well. Romney’s doing better, according to conventional wisdom at least, among Republican voters… fill in the gaps.

The turnout is so big that some towns fear they won’t have enough ballots. The more one watches what happens in the US, the more one gets the impression that Obama is leading a massive movement, almost a revolution. The numbers surprise James Joyner somewhat, especially because they indicate that all these people come out to vote for Obama. “I would have expected independents to swing towards the Republican contest, given that the polls show Obama winning comfortably while McCain and Romney are neck-and-neck,” he writes.

There’s something to that, but if this is becoming some sort of revolution, some kind of mass movement, the more success Obama has, the more success he will have in the future. That’s basically what happens in a popular support revolution. In the end, all opposition is swept aside.

Is that what we see happening here? By the looks of it, we could.

The strange thing is, I’ve got no idea what the revolution is exactly about. Nor does anyone else seem to know. Hope, change… OK, but hope for what? And what change?

Awkward. Awkward but fascinating.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Xel
    January 9th, 2008 at 01:17
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Looking forward to the end tallies tomorrow, even though I don’t like this strange chain reaction – Obama can win without it and he should. I don’t want to see him swept in because that could leave him a little inexperienced in a presidential race.

    I do wonder what the effects will be in South Carolina, and I also wonder if the dynamics will change once the primaries leave the "one after the other" progression and goes for Super Sunday.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.