Media Frenzy!

January 9th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Earlier today I listened to PoliGazette co-blogger Rick Moran’s Blog Talk Radio Show, logically called “The Rick Moran Show,” and it truly was a great show (I know that he’s calling in through Skype, like me, but he doesn’t seem to have any quality problems).

Rick’s guests were Rich Baehr, political correspondent of the American Thinker, and Tom Lifson, Editor-in-Chief of the same website, who brought quite some knowledge about politics and journalism to the table. As said, it was an interesting show, you can listen to it below the fold. Some quotes and thoughts of my own:

When talking about Obama and the media Rich and Rick made some good points. Rich said that the media “annointed” Barack Obama “not only the likely nominee, but Saint-Pope-Martin Luther King-Abe Lincoln-all in one.” Adding that “walking on water was just the first act.” But the voters beg to differ.

Rick points out that it could very well be that many young voters stayed home because of the media frenzy. “I’ve never seen anything quite like it in my life,” he said. Rich agreed and said that many journalists seem to have great difficult “not getting swept up in this,” which explains why they went after Hillary as aggressive as they did.

And with regards to the national presidential elections? Rich Baehr explains that the battle between Clinton and Obama is good news for Republicans because both are at least somewhat vulnerable. I agree with that, and I think he’s also right when he says that McCain could do very well against any Democrat because of support for him among independents, but I think that an Obama-McCain race would be something Obama doesn’t have to look up to because, if he wins, he’ll have beaten someone with a long record already and he has Independents’ support. O, and McCain is old, not very passionate at all times, and a DC Insider. Obama isn’t. He’s young, energetic, and inspiring.

But Rich is certainly right when he says that the media story that the Democrats have 80% of taking the White House in 08 could very well be wrong. It’s much more complicated than that, and the Republican aren’t beaten yet. Heck, it’s only January.

Anyway, later in the show they talked about how Clinton could use people like Paul Begala: he works for 527s and organizes them now, Rich argues. It’s illegal for Begala to coordinate the efforts of a 527 and to work for Clinton at the same time, but he can legally coordinate 527s that go after Obama before teaming up with Clinton.

All the above is only a small part of the show: notes taken during the first hour or so, so you’re wise to listen to the show in its entirety. Rick isn’t just a great new co-blogger, he’s also a great BTR host.

And yes, we’re becoming increasingly active on Blog Talk Radio. Rick joined us, and has his own BTR show, Jason and I host one, and Kevin Sullivan will have a show soon as well. You can listen to Rick’s show of yesterday by clicking on the “play” icon below:

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.