Rudy Giuliani on the War on Terrorism

January 9th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Pajamas Media’s – whose network we joined recently – Roger L. Simon and Claudia Rosett had the opportunity to talk to Rudy Giuliani about the war on terrorism. The conversation is party of PJM’s “War on Terror Conversations” series for which PJM will talk with, I think, all of the Republican candidates. You can watch the conversation (or read the transcript) with Giuliani by clicking here.

When watching this video it quickly becomes clear why Giuliani is one of the favorites of foreign policy hawks. He knows what he’s talking about, it seems, with regards to the war on terrorism and the war in Iraq, and he’s willing to fight this war for as long as it takes.

Giuliani made clear that he believes that the war in Afghanistan, not just Iraq, has to be won. If he’s president, he says, he’ll double the amount of American troops in this country. “Our job has to be to eliminate Al Qaeda and whatever else is left of the Taliban.” Roger tried to press Giuliani into saying something about Waziristan (Pakistan), but Giuliani isn’t willing to say that he’ll send US troops into Pakistan.

He’s also very clear about hypotheticals: he’s not going to answer hypothetical questions. If a coup takes place in Pakistan, the US will have to deal with it. For now, however, it isn’t useful to speculate about what may and may not happen. This is a good answer because everything a presidential candidate says with regards to foreign affairs can create a scandal, a controversy and chaos.

When Claudia Rosett asked Giuliani how we would get the state department to do what he wants them to do, the mayor didn’t give a very good answer. “Their principle role is to support the reputation of the United States of America. To make America more popular” he said. He’d “give that mission to the state department” who then has to improve America’s image which is, he says, undeservedly bad. But what if the State department doesn’t agree? What if the bureaucracy says isn’t willing to work with him? Giuliani’s answer: “you go back and try again.”

So? What will you do, try it ten times?

A little later he gave a somewhat better answer: you have to encourage people, you need incentives, you need a good secretary of state… all true, but even then it might be difficult to get the bureaucracy to move in the right direction.

Roger and Rosett also asked Giuliani about energy independence. He says that he’ll start a program much like the one to put a man on the moon and that this is a keystone of his program. This is popular among conservative voters, but as far as I understand it, the US will never become energy independent: it can only become less dependent on foreign countries. It would be great if one of the candidates would be forthright about that, also because a big program like the one Giuliani announces will cost the American tax payer a whole lot of money.

About how he would deal with the UN, Giuliani basically gave the answer conservatives like to hear (and I agree with them): America has to act in its own interest. Very often this means that the US should go to the UN in an attempt to get this organization to support its agenda, but sometimes it also means that the US has to decide to ignore the United Nations.

All in all, the conversation makes Giuliani look quite good. His ideas on foreign policy should appeal to a lot of hawks, most of whom are conservative. Of course, if you also read his Foreign Affairs contribution, you may have a somewhat nuanced view of his foreign policy plans (I know I do; wasn’t impressed to say the least), but it’s clear that – at least among Republican voters – this issue is one of Giuliani’s major strengths and that he knows it. A Giuliani administration will probably follow in Bush’s footsteps with regards to foreign policy. That’s very clear. That’s nothing new, but it’s interesting to hear one of the candidates talk about actual issues again.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Xel
    January 9th, 2008 at 17:35
    Reply | Quote | #1

    "he’s willing to fight this war for as long as it takes."

    Regarding Iraq I don’t think it’s about how long you are willing to struggle for results, it’s about how quickly you can achieve these results with your game plan.

    The candidates should take the problem seriously and stop thinking the "long haul" spiel is impressive.

  2. pjm | News trend world
    January 11th, 2008 at 18:32
    #4
Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.