Richardson to Drop Out

January 10th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The Democratic candidate for the presidency with the most experience, Bill Richardson, will drop out later today.

One wonders why he was in it in the first place since he didn’t have a chance of winning this thing. What’s more interesting than the news that he’s dropping out – about time I’d say – is who he will endorse. He and Clinton have had a good relationship for years, so it would make a lot of sense for him to endorse her. If this happens, will it help Clinton? I’d say probably yes, at least a bit. It wouldn’t hurt her with Hispanic voters and it would also make her more attractive among anti-war Democrats.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Luis Clemens
    January 10th, 2008 at 17:21
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Candidates enter the presidential race for all manner of reasons. Not least of which being each individual feels they can defy the long odds. Consider the case of Mike Huckabee – he was an asterisk not that long ago and is now a contender. As for Hispanic support for Clinton, she already enjoys a huge lead over Obama in this regard. Richardson, despite being Hispanic, never enjoyed a huge amount of support among Latino voters outside New Mexico. Luis Clemens Editor CandidatoUSA.com

  2. Interested
    January 10th, 2008 at 22:23
    Reply | Quote | #2

    apparently he has endorsed no one yet.

    Perhaps he doesn’t want to influence the Dem field, perhaps he doesn’t want to offend either Obama or Clinton, or perhaps he finds the rest of the field as wanting.

  3. kritter
    January 11th, 2008 at 21:43
    Reply | Quote | #3

    He may not have endorsed because he’s hoping to be offered the VP spot or another cabinet position. Its a smart thing to do.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.