John McCain: Frontrunner

January 13th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The latest CNN polls show that the man who started off as the Republican frontrunner, but who then fell back tremendously, John McCain is frontrunner once again.

McCain has the support of 34 percent of registered Republicans in a CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey out Friday. That’s a 21-point jump from the last CNN/Opinion Research poll, taken in December, well before the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary earlier this month.

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, who won the Iowa Republican caucuses, is in second place in the new survey, with 21 percent of those registered Republicans polled supporting him for the GOP nomination

Former Mayor of New York Rudy Giuliani is in third place with 18%, he’s followed closely by Mitt Romney with 14%.

This poll clearly shows just how important New Hampshire was. If Mitt Romney would’ve won in the Granite State, he would undoubtedly have the support of perhaps as much as 20% of Republicans nationwide. Since McCain won, however, he is the one who’s surging.

This is good news for McCain and it confirms the notion that McCain would quickly become the Republican frontrunner. Especially in combination with the knowledge that he’s also leading in the polls in South Carolina and Florida. O, and he’s also do well in Michigan.

As Ed Morrissey points out however, “[a] few caveats are in order about the CNN poll. The sample isn’t exactly sturdy. It only includes 397 registered Republicans, not likely primary voters. This doesn’t make for a reliable predictive model, but at least one can see some trends that won’t make the rest of the campaigns terribly happy.”

But the Michigan and Florida polls look more reliable and they also indicate that McCain is surging.

The conclusion: at this point in time, John McCain is the Republican frontrunner. He’s one of the few candidates that could convince the conservative coalition to rally behind him. He is, in a way, a logical compromise candidate. In my opinion not the best compromise candidate (I think that Romney and Fred Thompson are better compromise candidates), but a reasonably good one nonetheless.

O, and as Pete Abel said on PoliGazette Radio yesterday, moderate Republicans probably welcome this development. McCain could convince conservatives to vote for him and his nomination would probably make RLC Republicans quite happy.

Do these polls mean that the race is over? No. Absolutely not. Rudy Giuliani can still make a comeback, Romney may actually win in Michigan, Huckabee could win in South Carolina… no. Nothing has been decided yet.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Louis Nardozi
    January 12th, 2008 at 18:09
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Oh yeah, let’s just cut taxes but not spending. OVER 50% OF THE INCOME TAX IS USED TO PAY INTEREST ON THE DEBT. What kind of simpleminded poltroon cuts taxes without reducing the debt so we don’t have to pay it anymore?!?! Only Dr Paul has really given thought to this problem, apparently. He knows that just like individual credit card debt, paying the minimum payment is MADNESS! His message hasn’t changed either – stop expanding our money supply. See, when we buy imports SOMETHING has to go over there. When it isn’t goods, it’s money. We just keep printing more and more money, so we can get the goods without shipping any of OUR goods over there. It’s just that simple. If  you’re not enjoying the $3.00 gas and $5.00 milk and fresh fruit that costs more than steak, it’s just as simple as voting for Dr. Paul in the primaries. Besides, he’s the only one running that could beat ANY Democrat.

  2. kreiz
    January 13th, 2008 at 15:06
    Reply | Quote | #2

    According to Matt Tabbai of Rolling Stone, the big political story this year is how fractured both parties are- with the result being that the primaries are wide open.  I think he’s right.  McCain’s surging right now, but that could easily change if Huckabee rallies in SC and FL.  I can easily foresee a muddled Super Tuesday, with Romney lurking in the background.

    Political parties are no longer top-down institutions where the elites direct their minions how to vote.  If there’s a coalescing process around McCain developing, it’s percolating from the bottom-up- presumably outside of the GOP’s evangelical base.  I think it’s too early to discern that right now.

  3. kreiz
    January 13th, 2008 at 16:45
    Reply | Quote | #3

    On rereading, your caveat stood out- at this point in time.  Used to think this was a bit of overlawyering- but in today’s political climate, it’s an absolute must.  Romney’s apparent surge in MI polling shows that.

  4. Michael van der Galien
    January 13th, 2008 at 16:51
    Reply | Quote | #4

    Kreiz: exactly. Remember: I think that we’ve learned that it’s not a prediction of future votes as much as it is a sample of what people might do if they had to vote today (or better: yesterday or even the day before). The other polls put Romney (firmly) in the lead in Michigan, and if he wins… who knows what happens. Will conservatives flock to him? Will conservatives vote for Romney and will McCain’s support be based still on independents? And if so, what will huckabee supporters do? Will they stand by their man? If so, it continues to be a three-men race. O, and then there’s South Carolina. Can Thompson win there? If so, it’s a four-men race. And Florida, what’ll happen there?

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.