The fight between Mike Huckabee and Fred Thompson is getting uglier and uglier…
“Fred Thompson talks about putting America first, and yet he’s the one who is a registered foreign agent, lobbied for foreign countries, was in a law firm that did lobbying work for Libya,” Huckabee charged Sunday morning on CNN.
Thompson, who had launched an aggressive attack against Huckabee’s record during Thursday night’s GOP debate in Myrtle Beach, S.C., responded by insinuating that Huckabee is in truth nastier than his sunny demeanor, is unprepared for the presidency, and is making personal attacks while Thompson is “talking about issues concerning this country.”
Huckabee has “raised enough money now to get some hit pieces and dredge up personal stuff and personal accusations against me,” Thompson told CNN. “And now you’re seeing the real Mike Huckabee come out. So, I think we’ve done a favor to the American people. Because these are serious times, and they require somebody that knows what they’re doing and doesn’t walk into a situation with foreign representatives and heads of foreign nations with training wheels on.”
Told what Thompson said on CNN, Huckabee told reporters at the Greenville/Spartanburg Airport in Greer, S.C., Sunday afternoon, “Well, it seems like its perfectly okay for he or others to fire away these lengthy salvos at me, but if I respond then it’s a personal attack. If you’re gonna play big league ball, you have to stand at the plate as well as throw a few, and that’s just the way it works. If you really can’t handle that, you probably shouldn’t run for something as serious as president.”
O? But I thought that Huckabee didn’t play that game? That he was above politics as usual? Whatever happened to that? Or did that strategy only work when he didn’t raise enough money to compete? Funny that.
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
Comments are closed.
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.
