McCain and Newspapers

January 25th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Kevin believes that McCain is good at reaching “grassroot newspapers” and that this is why he’s doing well. The reason, however, that he’s good at reaching newspapers and the media in general is that he’s very accessible. Journalists have admitted themselves that they’re biased because of his accessibility. He gives them “quality time” and they love him for it.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Kevin Sullivan
    January 25th, 2008 at 20:54
    Reply | Quote | #1

    There are a lot of accessible politicians.  See Chuck Schumer.

    Point being, whether you like McCain or not, I’ll take the endorsement of these papers any day of the week.  They blur any perceived damage that may be caused by the Times nod.

  2. Tap
    January 25th, 2008 at 22:52
    Reply | Quote | #2

    I’m sure that accessability can’t hurt you in the eyes of the press, but that is hardly the reason they love him. If it were that easy, then George Bush would only have to grant a bunch of interviews to find love in the press…and that is patently absurd.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.