OK: forget about. McCain isn’t going to win the Republican nomination. Yesterday his obituary was published. In the form of a NYT endorsement. The idea behind the endorsement: McCain breaks with conservatives on important issues which is why he’s acceptable to liberals. Yeah. I’m not sure how that one actually, you know, helps McCain but thanks for the endorsement nonetheless NYT!
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
Comments are closed.
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.
LOL, with friends like these….
In the same op-ed, NYT gave an implicit endorsement of Giuliani. "What?" you say. Giuliani got some conservative street cred last night while responding to questions about the op-ed. How? Well, when a paper known for liberal bias rips a candidate up one side and down the other, he must be more conservative than we thought (or so the voting public might think).
Has anyone else noticed the vast amount of attention all those who are non-Republican pay to the Republican candidates?
Over at TMV why do SM, RS and MS post 9 Republican based threads to each 1 Democrat?
Are they still secretly running scared?……….that the Democrat candidates are not worth investigating because they will once again turn the election ball over inside the 20?
On one hand, my initial reaction to this NYT piece is why waste their newsprint and the readership’s time? Nonetheless, I just wonder if HRC gets the D nomination, might this "Plan B" endorsement actually be planting a seed?
“You wanna help me? Then please, stop helping me.”
Not the best endorsement, but don’t count out McCain:
http://americanpowerblog.blogspot.com/2008/01/mccain-is-most-electable-poll-finds.html