Comments on: “No Fat Chicks” http://www.poligazette.com/2008/02/02/no-fat-chicks/ Because Common Sense Transcends Distance Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:02:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Ban Restaurant Smoking http://www.poligazette.com/2008/02/02/no-fat-chicks/comment-page-1/#comment-27494 Ban Restaurant Smoking Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:49:38 +0000 http://poligazette.com/2008/02/02/no-fat-chicks/#comment-27494 <strong>Smoking Alternatives – When You Don’t Want to Smoke Which Is Best?...</strong> There are many people who want to give up smoking. There are also a lot of people who are forced to stop smoking, due to bans in restaurants, the workplace etc... Smoking Alternatives – When You Don’t Want to Smoke Which Is Best?…

There are many people who want to give up smoking. There are also a lot of people who are forced to stop smoking, due to bans in restaurants, the workplace etc…

]]> By: Debt Consolidation Loan http://www.poligazette.com/2008/02/02/no-fat-chicks/comment-page-1/#comment-25702 Debt Consolidation Loan Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:13:46 +0000 http://poligazette.com/2008/02/02/no-fat-chicks/#comment-25702 <strong>Debt Consolidation Loan...</strong> Essential consolidation with consolidation advice that assists with credit card consolidation.... Debt Consolidation Loan…

Essential consolidation with consolidation advice that assists with credit card consolidation….

]]> By: Under Universal Healthcare All Citizens to be Covered Until Age Thirty? « Samaritans Scalawags Scoundrels & Fleecing the Sheep http://www.poligazette.com/2008/02/02/no-fat-chicks/comment-page-1/#comment-23397 Under Universal Healthcare All Citizens to be Covered Until Age Thirty? « Samaritans Scalawags Scoundrels & Fleecing the Sheep Tue, 05 Feb 2008 12:50:37 +0000 http://poligazette.com/2008/02/02/no-fat-chicks/#comment-23397 [...] Jump to Comments I have been following a discussion over on Quad City Examiner’s Blog and the Poligazette on a post where Junk Food Science had blogged about a bipartisan effort in the State of Mississippi [...] [...] Jump to Comments I have been following a discussion over on Quad City Examiner’s Blog and the Poligazette on a post where Junk Food Science had blogged about a bipartisan effort in the State of Mississippi [...]

]]> By: thescoundrel http://www.poligazette.com/2008/02/02/no-fat-chicks/comment-page-1/#comment-23023 thescoundrel Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:08:29 +0000 http://poligazette.com/2008/02/02/no-fat-chicks/#comment-23023 The "Nanny" treatment is indeed bipartisan. The state movements to make gardasil a requirement for young girls, where schools have the right to make parental decisions concerning birth control decisions children without consulting parents, are just a few of those government knows best programs. The "Nanny" treatment is indeed bipartisan. The state movements to make gardasil a requirement for young girls, where schools have the right to make parental decisions concerning birth control decisions children without consulting parents, are just a few of those government knows best programs.

]]> By: abrisaham http://www.poligazette.com/2008/02/02/no-fat-chicks/comment-page-1/#comment-22747 abrisaham Sun, 03 Feb 2008 13:54:48 +0000 http://poligazette.com/2008/02/02/no-fat-chicks/#comment-22747 Jason mine was humor.  And considering the post said no one not just Fat women I had to assume your post withe the FAT CHICKS heading was written as a snark and designed to impede not encourage serious debate. Jason mine was humor.  And considering the post said no one not just Fat women I had to assume your post withe the FAT CHICKS heading was written as a snark and designed to impede not encourage serious debate.

]]> By: Jason http://www.poligazette.com/2008/02/02/no-fat-chicks/comment-page-1/#comment-22661 Jason Sun, 03 Feb 2008 02:09:06 +0000 http://poligazette.com/2008/02/02/no-fat-chicks/#comment-22661 Honestly, Abri, it is not necessary to hijack every thread with your Obama obsession. Honestly, Abri, it is not necessary to hijack every thread with your Obama obsession.

]]> By: abrisaham http://www.poligazette.com/2008/02/02/no-fat-chicks/comment-page-1/#comment-22659 abrisaham Sun, 03 Feb 2008 01:40:25 +0000 http://poligazette.com/2008/02/02/no-fat-chicks/#comment-22659 I fully support the fat chick agenda. In fact people look here.  If Obama is really moderate he would be willing to accept no fat chicks and in return Republicans would accept no more transfats. He then could make the case that Hillary is Fat and therefore cannot be president in a no fat chick society. I fully support the fat chick agenda.

In fact people look here.  If Obama is really moderate he would be willing to accept no fat chicks and in return Republicans would accept no more transfats.

He then could make the case that Hillary is Fat and therefore cannot be president in a no fat chick society.

]]> By: Tap http://www.poligazette.com/2008/02/02/no-fat-chicks/comment-page-1/#comment-22641 Tap Sat, 02 Feb 2008 22:17:45 +0000 http://poligazette.com/2008/02/02/no-fat-chicks/#comment-22641 The GOP ain't what it used to be. There seems to be a bit of a tiff going on about that very thing right now... The GOP ain’t what it used to be. There seems to be a bit of a tiff going on about that very thing right now…

]]> By: Claudia http://www.poligazette.com/2008/02/02/no-fat-chicks/comment-page-1/#comment-22627 Claudia Sat, 02 Feb 2008 21:01:20 +0000 http://poligazette.com/2008/02/02/no-fat-chicks/#comment-22627 <blockquote>From what I have been able to tell, the nanny state is bipartisan </blockquote> I'm glad you take that view, and I agree. I only mentioned it because the term "nanny-state" is much more often associated with Democrats than Republicans since, as I understand it, <em>traditional </em>conservative values are completely contrary to the nanny-state idea. Truth be told, when I read the item, I thought it must have been a Democrat. It sounds like just the sort of thing that would occur to the über-leftists where I grew up.

From what I have been able to tell, the nanny state is bipartisan

I’m glad you take that view, and I agree. I only mentioned it because the term "nanny-state" is much more often associated with Democrats than Republicans since, as I understand it, traditional conservative values are completely contrary to the nanny-state idea.

Truth be told, when I read the item, I thought it must have been a Democrat. It sounds like just the sort of thing that would occur to the über-leftists where I grew up.

]]> By: avraam jack http://www.poligazette.com/2008/02/02/no-fat-chicks/comment-page-1/#comment-22604 avraam jack Sat, 02 Feb 2008 19:47:51 +0000 http://poligazette.com/2008/02/02/no-fat-chicks/#comment-22604 <i>admin: off-topic spam deleted</i> admin: off-topic spam deleted

]]>