Double Your Pleasure…

February 5th, 2008 By: marc moore | Tags:

…by marrying multiple women and helping to destroy Britain by increasing the strain that you and yours put on the infidel nation’s already burgeoning welfare state!

It sounds ridiculous – heck, it is ridiculous! – but the new guidelines issued by the Department for Work and Pensions read thusly:

“Where there is a valid polygamous marriage the claimant and one spouse will be paid the couple rate

… The amount payable for each additional spouse is presently £33.65.”

Hhhmmm. No clarifying data was given, but I’m going to assume that this is a monthly amount. The approximately $70 granted per additional concubine – sorry mate, there’s only one wife in this day and age (and yes, she must be female!) – is more of a token payment, if my assumption is correct.

Perhaps three or four can live as cheaply as two in Britain? No, I thought not.

But wait, there’s more good news for polygamous lawbreakers and their many companions:

Under the deal agreed by ministers, a husband with multiple wives may also be eligible for additional housing benefit and council tax benefit to reflect the larger property needed for his family.

Islamic law permits men to have up to four wives at any one time – known as a harem – provided the husband spends equal amounts of time and money on each of them.

During the .com bust a few years back a friend of mine had identified England as a likely place to leave the U.S. for in the event the poo really hit the fan here. Wouldn’t that have been a decision to regret, what with these geniuses running the asylum?

The review concluded in December last year with agreement that the extra benefits should continue to be paid, the Government admitted. The decision was not publicly announced.

Four departments – the Treasury, the DWP, HM Revenue and Customs, and the Home Office – were involved in the review, which concluded that recognising multiple marriages conducted overseas was “the best possible” option. In Britain, bigamy is punishable by up to seven years in prison.

Yep, allowing a specific subculture with an inclination for achieving high birth rates and encouraging anti-democratic violence is definitely the best possible option!

No, wait, here’s a better one: How about enforcing the laws of the land and protecting Britain’s cultural norms? Evidently that is too difficult for Labor. Not surprisingly, the clowns in the DWP lack even the spine to keep their own regulations from being gamed:

Entry clearance may not be withheld from a second wife where the husband has divorced his previous wife and the divorce is thought to be one of convenience,” an immigration rulebook advises. “This is so, even if the husband is still living with the previous wife and to issue the entry clearance would lead to the formation of a polygamous household.”

The Tories are said furious and justifiably so. There is at least one man with a bit of courage left in England, though that’s scant hope for the notion that the light of logic and common sense might not be turned off there just yet:

Chris Grayling, the shadow work and pensions secretary, said that the decision was “completely unjustifiable”.

“You are not allowed to have multiple marriages in the UK, so to have a situation where the benefits system is treating people in different ways is totally unacceptable and will serve to undermine confidence in the system.

“This sets a precedent that will lead to more demands for the culture of other countries to be reflected in UK law and the benefits system.”

Mr Grayling also accused the Government of trying to keep the ruling quiet because the topic is so controversial.

Quite.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Claudia
    February 5th, 2008 at 09:49
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Oh goodie, so when will the NHS start paying for the disfigurement circumcision of little girls?

    Does the UK not have a clause anywhere in it’s law that states that there will be no discrimination on the basis of religion? This regulation gives special treatment to Islamic (men) by saying that only their multiple marriages are valid.

    Never mind it contributes to perpetuate a situation of semi-slavery and a philosophy that treats women as so many cows.  Speaking of women, where are the feminist groups of the UK. In a rational society they’d be screaming their heads off at this government subsidized oppression.

  2. Mel
    February 19th, 2008 at 07:39
    Reply | Quote | #2

    "" This regulation gives special treatment to Islamic (men) by saying that only their multiple marriages are valid.""

    So make Polygamy legal for everybody, thats one problem solved.

    ""Never mind it contributes to perpetuate a situation of semi-slavery and a philosophy that treats women as so many cows.""

    semi-slavery? Nobody is forcing these women to live in such a relationship, its just about choice. Just as nobody forced the Wives of Tom Greene to defend their husband in Utah. A self righteous Feminazi who huffs and puffs her chest is truly a comical sight to behold.

  3. Personal Loans Unsecured
    February 28th, 2008 at 20:32
    #3
Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.