Saudi Thought Police Bust Mom in Starbucks

February 7th, 2008 By: marc moore | Tags:

The 7th century geniuses who brought us jihad are still hard at work, this time making the world safe for male Muslim coffee drinkers:

A 37-year-old American businesswoman and married mother of three is seeking justice after she was thrown in jail by Saudi Arabia’s religious police for sitting with a male colleague at a Starbucks coffee shop in Riyadh.

She sat in a curtained booth with her business partner in the café’s “family” area, the only seats where men and women are allowed to mix.

For Yara, it was a matter of convenience. But in Saudi Arabia, public contact between unrelated men and women is strictly prohibited.

“Some men came up to us with very long beards and white dresses. They asked ‘Why are you here together?’. I explained about the power being out in our office. They got very angry and told me what I was doing was a great sin,” recalled Yara, who wears an abaya and headscarf, like most Saudi women.

The men were from Saudi Arabia’s Commission for Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice, a police force of several thousand men charged with enforcing dress codes, sex segregation and the observance of prayers.

Yara, whose parents are Jordanian and grew up in Salt Lake City, once believed that life in Saudi Arabia was becoming more liberal. But on Monday the religious police took her mobile phone, pushed her into a cab and drove her to Malaz prison in Riyadh. She was interrogated, strip-searched and forced to sign and fingerprint a series of confessions pleading guilty to her “crime”.

“They took me into a filthy bathroom, full of water and dirt. They made me take off my clothes and squat and they threw my clothes in this slush and made me put them back on,” she said. Eventually she was taken before a judge.

“He said ‘You are sinful and you are going to burn in hell’. I told him I was sorry. I was very submissive. I had given up. I felt hopeless,” she said.

I imagine the Promoters of Virtue got a naughty little thrill out of abusing the woman that’s not atypical for their kind.

It’s the Sharia law that these fine fellows are so diligent about enforcing that is, according to the Archbishop of Canterbury (“Culture Buried”, per Gaius) says is inevitable in Britain.

I refuse to believe that.  Stupidity of this kind should be opposed everywhere, at all times.  Hopefully Yara will fight the good fight in Saudi, though one could hardly blame her for abandoning it.  We’ve seen what they do to victims there.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. redfish
    February 8th, 2008 at 00:28
    Reply | Quote | #1

    and she was patronizing an american business establishment

  2. Claudia
    February 8th, 2008 at 00:42
    Reply | Quote | #2

    I remember years ago there was an issue about an American woman who got trouble in Saudi Arabia because she didn’t want to wear the veil, and also wanted to be able to drive for herself without a male accompaniment.

    Oh, and she was an General in the army.

    I don’t remember her name, but I remember she had an amazing record, and was tough as nails. She was still forced to "submit" as a lesser female to men she could probably kill with her bare hands without breaking a sweat, because she happened to be stationed in Saudi Arabia.

  3. wj
    February 8th, 2008 at 16:56
    Reply | Quote | #4

    It has been my observation (in 2004, just for reference) that women’s attire in Saudi Arabia falls into 3 categories:
    - Saudi women — totally covered, except for an eye-slit.
    - non-Saudi Muslim women — head scarf, but face bare
    - non-Muslim women — bare headed (although still in floor-length, long-sleeved dresses)

    And I have seen non-Muslim women, travelling about Riyadh on their own.  Even going into government ministries alone.  In one particular case, the Ministry of the Interior Data Center.  (I believe she was consulting on some technical issues.)  And the Ministry of the Interior not being one of the (relative) bastions of liberalism in the country. 

    So perhaps Ms. Yara made a tactical error in wearing a head-scarf. 

  4. Nihat
    February 8th, 2008 at 19:07
    Reply | Quote | #5

    Yeah, she engaged in immoral behavior while looking like a ‘non-Saudi Muslim woman’. She should have known better.

  5. wj
    February 9th, 2008 at 16:14
    Reply | Quote | #6

    Nihat, I’m certainly not defending the behavior of the religious police!  On the other hand, if you are somewhere that is known to have such things, it seems prudent to take any measures you can which might help keep them at bay.   Not because there is any justification for their behavior, but because you are going to have to live with the consequences of their nonsense.

  6. Nihat
    February 9th, 2008 at 17:15
    Reply | Quote | #7

    wj, I didn’t mean to disparage you (I’d seen your point, which is not invalid). But I’m fed up with this face of Islam, and refusing to lend any legitimacy to it in any realm.

  7. A. A. B.
    February 10th, 2008 at 22:30
    Reply | Quote | #8

    Probably she is a "non-Saudi Muslim woman", since she is of Jordanian origin… Anyway, Saudi Arabia is on of the main problems of contemporary Islam. They have primitive crap in their heads, mistreat people on their territory and worse, they have lots of oil money and use it to brainwash people around the globe into their ideology.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.