<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here Come the Scripts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poligazette.com/2008/02/13/here-come-the-scripts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/02/13/here-come-the-scripts/</link>
	<description>Because Common Sense Transcends Distance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:48:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jay_C</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/02/13/here-come-the-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-25180</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay_C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/02/13/here-come-the-scripts/#comment-25180</guid>
		<description>Robert, Voldemort is their &quot;secret code word&quot; for Ron Paul. Cute, huh? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, Voldemort is their &quot;secret code word&quot; for Ron Paul. Cute, huh? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert E.</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/02/13/here-come-the-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-25179</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/02/13/here-come-the-scripts/#comment-25179</guid>
		<description>PS, Jason.

In most of the primaries so far a majority of voters voted &lt;em&gt;against&lt;/em&gt; McCain. If you win with 35% of the vote, that still leaves 65% who voted against you.  This may turn out to be a crucial distinction, come convention time.

Not that this will likely change much for RP, but it may very well rob McCain of his prize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS, Jason.</p>
<p>In most of the primaries so far a majority of voters voted <em>against</em> McCain. If you win with 35% of the vote, that still leaves 65% who voted against you.  This may turn out to be a crucial distinction, come convention time.</p>
<p>Not that this will likely change much for RP, but it may very well rob McCain of his prize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert E.</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/02/13/here-come-the-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-25177</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/02/13/here-come-the-scripts/#comment-25177</guid>
		<description>Jason, I have no idea who Voldemort is and doubt that I should care.

You keep suggesting that the delegates have to resort to lies.  That&#039;s news to me.  The rules are clear.  During the first round &quot;pledged&quot; delegates are bound to vote for the candidate who won their primary.  During any subsequent rounds they are free to vote any way they like &lt;em&gt;at that time&lt;/em&gt;.

Frankly, I never meant to suggest that RP would somehow come out of that process as the winner.  The single point I wanted to make, is that McCain&#039;s &quot;victory&quot; is far from being a done deal. A lot can happen at the convention and I for one am more than willing to concede that I have no idea what the end result will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, I have no idea who Voldemort is and doubt that I should care.</p>
<p>You keep suggesting that the delegates have to resort to lies.  That&#8217;s news to me.  The rules are clear.  During the first round &quot;pledged&quot; delegates are bound to vote for the candidate who won their primary.  During any subsequent rounds they are free to vote any way they like <em>at that time</em>.</p>
<p>Frankly, I never meant to suggest that RP would somehow come out of that process as the winner.  The single point I wanted to make, is that McCain&#8217;s &quot;victory&quot; is far from being a done deal. A lot can happen at the convention and I for one am more than willing to concede that I have no idea what the end result will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/02/13/here-come-the-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-25173</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/02/13/here-come-the-scripts/#comment-25173</guid>
		<description>Right.  I keep forgetting that the original intent of the Founders was to have a candidate that consistently finished in fifth place in primary elections receive a shot at the Presidency because his supporters are fanatic enough to lie about who they really support in order to get a vote at a nominating convention.

Silly me.  Glad that we have the constitutional experts among the Voldemorts to keep reminding us that the true constitutional way involves deception and mass disenfranchisement.  But I suppose a few eggs will have to be broken to stop that evil NAFTA superhighway, right?

Seriously, with this bizarre scenario, you&#039;re making Hillary&#039;s contortions in her attempts to win at any cost by using arcane back-door procedures to circumvent the express will of the voters look positively idealistic.  I mean, I&#039;ve been critical of the Voldemorts for long time because I thought I detected a vein of authoritarianism within their spam-filled, thread-hijacking &quot;movement&quot;, but I never expected that one of them would go as far as you have to so clearly and absolutely confirm those suspicions.  Proposing to steal the nomination at the convention by using lying delegates really takes the cake!

Oh, wait.  You didn&#039;t propose that.  You just said it was possible.

Riiiiiiight.

I believe that any candidate who attempted what you suggest would be resoundingly rejected in the general election by voters in all 50 states.  I doubt they would win so much as a single congressional district.  And BTW, isn&#039;t Voldemort about to lose his?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right.  I keep forgetting that the original intent of the Founders was to have a candidate that consistently finished in fifth place in primary elections receive a shot at the Presidency because his supporters are fanatic enough to lie about who they really support in order to get a vote at a nominating convention.</p>
<p>Silly me.  Glad that we have the constitutional experts among the Voldemorts to keep reminding us that the true constitutional way involves deception and mass disenfranchisement.  But I suppose a few eggs will have to be broken to stop that evil NAFTA superhighway, right?</p>
<p>Seriously, with this bizarre scenario, you&#8217;re making Hillary&#8217;s contortions in her attempts to win at any cost by using arcane back-door procedures to circumvent the express will of the voters look positively idealistic.  I mean, I&#8217;ve been critical of the Voldemorts for long time because I thought I detected a vein of authoritarianism within their spam-filled, thread-hijacking &quot;movement&quot;, but I never expected that one of them would go as far as you have to so clearly and absolutely confirm those suspicions.  Proposing to steal the nomination at the convention by using lying delegates really takes the cake!</p>
<p>Oh, wait.  You didn&#8217;t propose that.  You just said it was possible.</p>
<p>Riiiiiiight.</p>
<p>I believe that any candidate who attempted what you suggest would be resoundingly rejected in the general election by voters in all 50 states.  I doubt they would win so much as a single congressional district.  And BTW, isn&#8217;t Voldemort about to lose his?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert E.</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/02/13/here-come-the-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-25172</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/02/13/here-come-the-scripts/#comment-25172</guid>
		<description>Jason,

It appears that you are confusing &quot;constitutional&quot; with &quot;democratic&quot;.  The convention rules are decidedly constitutional and as such most definitely undemocratic.  You may thank the Founders for that small blessing. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason,</p>
<p>It appears that you are confusing &quot;constitutional&quot; with &quot;democratic&quot;.  The convention rules are decidedly constitutional and as such most definitely undemocratic.  You may thank the Founders for that small blessing. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/02/13/here-come-the-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-25170</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/02/13/here-come-the-scripts/#comment-25170</guid>
		<description>Yet another new definition of &quot;constitutional governance&quot; from the Voldemorts: using trojan horse delegates to steal the nomination against the express will of more than 90% of primary and caucus voters.

ROFL -- the true colors burst forth at last.

But the spamming and thread hijacking are consistent.  Posts get written about McCain, Hillary, and Obama and then &lt;strong&gt;here come the Voldemorts&lt;/strong&gt;....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another new definition of &quot;constitutional governance&quot; from the Voldemorts: using trojan horse delegates to steal the nomination against the express will of more than 90% of primary and caucus voters.</p>
<p>ROFL &#8212; the true colors burst forth at last.</p>
<p>But the spamming and thread hijacking are consistent.  Posts get written about McCain, Hillary, and Obama and then <strong>here come the Voldemorts</strong>&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert E.</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/02/13/here-come-the-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-25169</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/02/13/here-come-the-scripts/#comment-25169</guid>
		<description>Tully, I think you misread many of us.

Yes, we are naturally disappointed at the course of events - &lt;em&gt;so far. &lt;/em&gt;Most of us however are far from disheartened.

First of all there is &lt;a href=&quot;../../../01/30/its-mccain-hillary/#comment-25157&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the fact that McCain&#039;s &quot;done deal&quot; is actually no where near as done as the MSM would have you believe&lt;/a&gt;. under a different thread.

Second, there is the fact that our fundamental message of &lt;em&gt;Liberty, Prosperity and Peace through minimal constitutional governance&lt;/em&gt; has not received this much interest since the penning of Declaration of Independence.

Third, many &quot;RP Republicans&quot;, including the Dr. himself are running and winning in local elections.

This is a movement which is much bigger that RP and it will surely outlive him and flourish for many years to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tully, I think you misread many of us.</p>
<p>Yes, we are naturally disappointed at the course of events &#8211; <em>so far. </em>Most of us however are far from disheartened.</p>
<p>First of all there is <a href="../../../01/30/its-mccain-hillary/#comment-25157" rel="nofollow">the fact that McCain&#8217;s &quot;done deal&quot; is actually no where near as done as the MSM would have you believe</a>. under a different thread.</p>
<p>Second, there is the fact that our fundamental message of <em>Liberty, Prosperity and Peace through minimal constitutional governance</em> has not received this much interest since the penning of Declaration of Independence.</p>
<p>Third, many &quot;RP Republicans&quot;, including the Dr. himself are running and winning in local elections.</p>
<p>This is a movement which is much bigger that RP and it will surely outlive him and flourish for many years to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/02/13/here-come-the-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-25168</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/02/13/here-come-the-scripts/#comment-25168</guid>
		<description>Tully, you missed &lt;a href=&quot;../../../../wp-admin/edit-comments.php#comment-25157&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the real doozy&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tully, you missed <a href="../../../../wp-admin/edit-comments.php#comment-25157" rel="nofollow">the real doozy</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tully</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/02/13/here-come-the-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-25165</link>
		<dc:creator>Tully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/02/13/here-come-the-scripts/#comment-25165</guid>
		<description>I see the Paulites are bitter in their disappointment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the Paulites are bitter in their disappointment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/02/13/here-come-the-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-25146</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/02/13/here-come-the-scripts/#comment-25146</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Prediction: Most partisan Democrats won’t have any objection to [swiftboating] this time.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;Mayhaps. Not being a Democrat, though, I can&#039;t say with any certainty how they&#039;ll react. BTW, Kerry was attacked with false accusations. McCain&#039;s record is a matter of public record, and it sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&quot;Prediction: Most partisan Democrats won’t have any objection to [swiftboating] this time.&quot;</p></blockquote>
<p>Mayhaps. Not being a Democrat, though, I can&#8217;t say with any certainty how they&#8217;ll react. BTW, Kerry was attacked with false accusations. McCain&#8217;s record is a matter of public record, and it sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
