Iraqi Kurds not ready to deliver on PKK

March 1st, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Turkish Daily News has a good article up about Iraqi Kurds, and the role they play in Iraq nowadays. And, of course, their attitude towards the PKK. In short: “Iraqi Kurdish leaders want to mend their relationships with Turkey but are still not on the same page with Ankara regarding the necessity to fight the outlawed Kurdistan Worker’s Party (PKK).”

Iraqi Kurds feel they are trapped between Iraqi Arabs and Iran and believe they have been let down by the Americans, said Soner Cagaptay, director of the Turkish Research Program at the Washington Institute. Cagaptay was in northern Iraq last week as a delegation from the Washington-based think tank went to the region to talk with Iraqi Kurdish authorities. The delegation was in Ankara Thursday to brief officials from the Turkish government.

‘Our first finding is that the Kurds have lost their numerical strength and political weight within the central Iraqi administration,’ said Cagaptay in an interview with the Turkish Daily News. The end of the boycott of the Iraqi parliament by Sunni Arabs seems to have eroded the numerical strength of Iraqi Kurds. Thanks to the surge of American troops, northern Iraq is no longer the only stable region in Iraq, as the rest of the country has become largely stable, despite exceptions in certain areas. Add to this fact the increasing cooperation between the United States and the Sunnis, and this explains, the erosion in Kurds’ political weight, said Cagaptay.

‘The authorities of the Kurdish Regional Government (KRG) feel they bump into an Arab bloc on every issue,’ said Cagaptay, who held talks in Arbil, Suleymania and Dohuk. The KRG is facing a Sunni-Shiite bloc mainly on the government budget, the hydrocarbon law, and the issue of the status of Kirkuk. Payment of the salaries of the Peshmerga, the Kurdish military force, by the central administration is also an issue of contention between Baghdad and the KRG.

Cagaptay went on to say: “Kurds are very disappointed that they are losing their former weight in the Iraqi central administration.” If that’s not enough, Iraqi Kurds aren’t exactly satisfied by the American government either. “They are concerned by Iranian intelligence units and Tehran’s support of radical Islamic groups in the region. If they cross Tehran, they feel it might hurt them through these assets,” he said.

The KRG wants to have a better relationship with Turkey, but it disagrees with the Turks on the most important issue of all: the PKK. “They do not recognize the PKK as a terrorist organization, and furthermore, the border between the enclaves of the PKK and the KRG is not sealed,” Cagaptay said.

So, what has to be done. Easy, Cagaptay says. “The U.S. needs to put pressure on the KRG for action against the PKK.”

If the KRG truly wants to improve the relationship with Turkey, it has to recognize the PKK as a terrorist organization and fight the PKK, and / or it needs to convince the PKK that it should dissolve itself and work for the KRG. It will take a lot of pressure to get the KRG to do so though. And that’s a job for the US. The US has a reasonably good relationship with both the KRG and Turkey and stability in the region is in America’s own interest.

In short; when will the media ask the presidential candidates what they plan to do about this?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. A. A. B.
    March 1st, 2008 at 23:50
    Reply | Quote | #1

    The question is: What would the Kurdish regional government gain from opposing the PKK?

    If Turkey wants something from the KRG they should offer them something in return as well. But they don’t seem to be willing to do that, they don’t even accept direct negociations.

  2. Nihat
    March 2nd, 2008 at 00:31
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Well said AAB. Both logic and these developments as given in the TDN article show that NI Kurds have nobody to rely on in the long term except Turkey. I am very frustrated with Turkish short sightedness. IMO, Turkey loooks like unable to make calculations on her own, for her own interests. (I should  have said recalculations for, clearly, some redefinition of our interests is needed here.) Instead we keep agitating ourselves with supposedly ill-intentioned calculations of other parties (the US and Israel in particular).

  3. Michael van der Galien
    March 2nd, 2008 at 00:55
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Nihat and A.A.B.: I certainly agree that the Turkish government should give the KRG something in return. Trouble is, what do they want? They wanted Turkey to withdraw immediately, despite the obvious fact that Turkey had to do something about the PKK. In other words, they can’t expect Turkey to take hit after hit but do nothing.

    I think that Turkey should have a quid pro quo attitude. We won’t invade anymore and we’ll trade (more) with you, we’ll help you out financially and diplomatically (etc.), if you renounce the PKK and do something about them.

  4. Abdullah Cevdet
    March 2nd, 2008 at 09:50
    Reply | Quote | #4

    The question is, will the Turks accept the Kurdish minority. This isn’t a PKK problem, but a Turkish problem. Till 1980 Turks tried to wipe out Kurdish identity and the Kemalist and the military establishment are still thinking in this way.  The AK-government can’t do anything about the Kurdish issue, because the Turkish army will crush them.

    The Turkish army is the real leader of these politics. The army has since 80 years ago monopolised the Kurdish question and sometimes is working together with the politicians, sometimes taking the initiative. The latest operation was a warning to the Kurdish government, government of Erdogan and not aimed against the PKK. The PKK isn’t a threat anymore, but a tool to be used by the TSK.

    http://www.kurdish-info.net/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=9782

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.