Americans Turn To Web For News

March 2nd, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Good news for people (entrepreneurs!) like myself: increasingly more Americans are turning to the Internet for news. That’s, of course great because it means that more Americans are likely to read my drivel (and of course the high quality posts of my co-bloggers), but it’s also great because America often sets the trend globally.

In other words: if more Americans turn to the Internet for news, it’s likely that Europeans will follow suit.

The Internet has become the primary source for news for nearly 50% of Americans. That’s almost 10% up compared to only a year ago. This makes the Web the most popular news source of all: television follows with less than 33%, radio is third with only 11% and newspapers, I’m sure you’ve heard of them (they used to read them in the 19th century) fourth with 10%.

One of the reasons given (by Reuters) for this development is that approximately 70% of Americans “believe traditional journalism is out of touch.” On top of that, “64 percent are dissatisfied with the quality of journalism in their communities.”

But, Howard Finberg, of the Poynter Institute in St. Petersburg, Florida who is quoted by Reuters, says: these Americans are seemingly naive or uninformed because they don’t seem to understand that “the sources they are accessing online such as Google News and Yahoo News pull stories from newspapers, television, wire services and other media sources.” In other words, how’s the Internet better?

Well, Mr. Finberg doesn’t understand something: he seems to think that people turn to the Internet and then read the normal articles at, say, the New York Times and the Washington Post. The reality is, however, that many peoples end up at blogs such as this one. Yes, bloggers often use material provided by newspapers and networks, but they’re also giving their own take on the situation and they´re often combining reports of one organization with reports of another one. In other words, they do fact checking, they do opinion and they do analysis.

O, and they put the news into perspective.

That’s seemingly ignored by Finberg et all, as well as by traditional media outlets. Until they learn this lesson, they’ll lose readership while websites like this thrive.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Jay_C
    March 3rd, 2008 at 21:53
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Don’t forget that people also turn to sites like YouTube as proof to backup  /discredit stories that the hear about as well.  Additionally, since the web enables access to multiple opinions readers can build a fuller picture of possible points of view.  From my experience, however, it does seem that "hit-and-run" opinion does outweigh real analysis and debate on the web.

  2. Jay_C
    March 3rd, 2008 at 21:55
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Let me just add that I am not talking about this site, just in general.

  3. Michael van der Galien
    March 3rd, 2008 at 22:12
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Let me just add that I am not talking about this site, just in general.

    Oef. Just in time. I almost had to ban you there ;)

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.