Hillary Clinton on Saturday Night Live

March 2nd, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Is Hillary Clinton creating some momentum? She’s up with 4% in the latest Ohio poll, and only 2% behind in the latest Texas poll. On top of that, she appeared on Saturday Night Live yesterday, and did quite well. You can watch a clip of it here. “Do I really laugh like that?”

That’s funny.

One of the main things about SNL is that the candidates can prove, or disprove of course, that they have a sense of humor. Unlike her nickname (The Glacier) suggests, Hillary does have a sense of humor. And what’s more fun than watching an important woman (person) making fun of herself?

Meanwhile, head on over to Crooks and Liars if you want to read what far-left supporters of Obama have to say about SNL and Hillary Clinton. These people clearly lack a sense of humor. Of course, that’s a sign of radicalism. Radicals seldom have a sense of humor. They’re too busy being… I dunno, radical.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. redfish
    March 2nd, 2008 at 20:55
    Reply | Quote | #1

    The problem is that most of Hillary’s jokes look as if they’re staged to make her look more likable. There’s nothing likable about focus-group driven attempts to humanize a candidate. I don’t think use of humor always says something positive about a candidate either. For example, I remember a lot of people saying how good Hillary’s spoof of the last Soprano’s episode was. But if you have to run a campaign on gimmicks, its probably done in place of a more serious calling.

  2. chris vant
    March 2nd, 2008 at 21:37
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Don’t be silly, or I apologize if you just can’t tell… Senator Clinton only needs to share her guarded genuine side. She is funny and
    bright. Great sense of humor and she is demonstrating a short learning curve how to show off her hidden charm.

  3. winterhunt
    March 2nd, 2008 at 21:45
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Redfish,
    Gimmicks, Like Obama saying he is all about bringing people together and then taking Spiritual Advice to this day and the title of his book from his Pastor who has repeatedly honored Louis Farrkhan, and visited Quadaffi in Libya with him. Or do you mean gimmicks like how Obama proclaims he was always against the war but in 2004 stated that he didn’t know how he would have voted??? Or do you meam gimmicks as when Obama talks about all his Ethics and transparency but has deep, deep ties to Tony Rezko???? Are those gimmicks or just out and out deception????? By the way for anyone who wants to dismiss any of what I listed above, just google it for yourself and makeup your own mind about this so-called "New Politics"…… This man is a complete phony and an utter joke……

  4. redfish
    March 2nd, 2008 at 22:23
    Reply | Quote | #4

    chris vant, the genuine hillary has a likeable side, and arrogant, bitter side, which has been written and reported on. she’s needed to guard both, because all and all, she’s been ambitious.

    winterhunt, im not necessarily contrasting hillary to obama. i’m just saying that if humor fills in for lack of an earnest campaign, its not better.

  5. Alice
    March 3rd, 2008 at 03:15
    Reply | Quote | #5

    Gee, imagine that, a person running for president is ambitious!  Well, what will they accuse Hillary of next? 

    The presidency does not fall in your lap, my friend.  You are right, Hillary, Obama, and John are all ambitious.  Guarded–yes public people with any class are guarded or in Obama’s case "aloof" seems to be the favorite word.  Not everyone cares to go around like Britney Spears.  We have forgotten what dignity is about in our country.

  6. redfish
    March 3rd, 2008 at 04:13
    Reply | Quote | #6

    I don’t know who you mean when you say they, but I’m not persecuting Hillary. You know what people mean when they say ambitious, and it doesn’t simply mean that they want to do something.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.