Top Turkish Court: Religious Education Not Compulsory

March 5th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

One of the strange things about the Turkish educational system, in my eyes, is that religious education is compulsory. That’s awkward for a country that calls itself laicist, in my opinion at least. And it’s all the more awkward because it’s not just religious education which is compulsory, it focuses on Sunni Islam. Well, the Turkish high court seems to agree with me: it has now ruled that education classes can’t be compulsory, in its current format at least.

The case came to court because two parents filed a complaint. They are Alevis, a kind of Shi’ite Muslims, and they objected to the Sunni Islamic religious classes. Why should their children be taught how to be good Sunni Muslims, or better; how to think and live like Sunni Muslims?

Good question.

Such a good question that the court decided to answer it. And the answer is “a major victory for Turkey’s Alevi community.” They “have long complained of discrimination and forced assimilation through mandatory courses on Sunni Islam.”

Now, the far majority of Turks are Sunni Muslims. So, if you want to focus on religion it’s logical, me thinks, to teach about Sunni Islam. But if a person isn’t a Sunni, well, there should be a different approach. Either, then, teach about different kinds of sects or don’t teach at all. Or, better, don’t make it compulsory.

And that’s basically what the court said as well. “For the Religious Culture and Morality course to be mandatory under its current content is against the law,” the Council of State ruled.

Turkey’s education ministry now has two choices: it either has to teach about all, or at least more, religions / faiths or it has to make the “Religious Culture and Morality” course non-mandatory.

A good decision, in my eyes.

The AK Parti, meanwhile, doesn’t like the decision… at all.

Justice and Development Party (AKP) deputy leader, Dengir Mir Mehmet Fırat, speaking yesterday during his visit to New York, said he believed the court’s decision was wrong, arguing that the Council of State exceeded its authority.

He said the Council of State did not have the power to assess the Constitution. Fırat also said that the body that would implement the European Court of Human Rights decision was the Constitutional Court, not the Council of State.

 

He said he believed the decision would be corrected.

 I think that this ruling is quite a blow for Erdogan et al.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Nihat
    March 5th, 2008 at 22:10
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Ouch, those courts! Eh!

    What makes me laugh till my tummy starts aching is that these Islamists, a.k.a. ’liberal democrats’ of Turkey appear to be inspired mostly by the American system. When in fact their stated goal is indoctrination of minds when they are young and amenable. (Ref. for ’stated’: Necmettin Erbakan)

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.