Should Obama and Clinton Go After John McCain

March 6th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Kevin Sullivan notices that quite some progressive bloggers call on both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton to stop attacking each other and to, instead, focus on the Republican nominee, Senator John McCain. “While this may seem like a good idea in a cerebral sort of way,” Kevin writes, “it presents challenges for both Democrats.” In order to know what ‘challenges’ Kevin’s aiming at, I’d say head on over to Independent Liberal. Below follows my take on it.

Again, first read Kevin’s post; I agree with him, but I won’t repeat his points. There’s simply no use in doing so.

But I do have some additional thoughts I wanted to write down: I think that the Democrats should be focused  on each other right now. The fact of the matter is that the race isn’t between Obama-Clinton-McCain… for the two Democrats it’s strictly… between them. To them, McCain shouldn’t matter. Not at this point in time. They’ll months to go after John McCain if they win. Now isn’t necessary.

On the other hand, going after McCain would make sense in so far that the Democrat who does so, basically presents him- or herself as the nominee or at least as the frontrunner. As far as I’m concerned, the race for the Democratic nomination is still wide open, but the person who could play the role of the anti-McCain best is Senator Barack Obama; after all, he’s leading in delegates and he has won more states.

O, and – to a degree – he and McCain are going after the same votes.

All in all, though, I agree with Kevin that it’s better for the two Democrats to ignore McCain for now. It also has to be pointed out that as long as they’re talking about themselves and each other McCain isn’t getting a whole lot of press. If they, on the other hand, go after McCain journalists will go to him, ask him questions, he’ll respond and… he’ll get a lot of media attention.

No, it makes more sense for Clinton and Obama to focus on each other for now. McCain… McCain is a Republican, and at this moment they’re not running against the Republican but against each other.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. C Stanley
    March 6th, 2008 at 14:23
    Reply | Quote | #2

    I think the last point about media attention is the biggest reason that strategically, attacking McCain constantly would be bad for both Dem candidates. McCain stands to gain from the prolonged fight for the Dem nomination anyway- but the one way that it can hurt him (or not help) is if he falls off the public radar screen too much. The worst thing for McCain is to get no attention at all, and for the public to increasingly view the Dem primary process as the general election itself- as though we’re choosing between those two to become our next president. If the two of them start using the McCain attacks a lot, then the public will not forget that it’s really one of the two Dems vs. McCain in the general.

  2. C Stanley
    March 6th, 2008 at 14:27
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Also, I think it would be very wise for McCain to constantly try to bait the two Dems into attacking him. He should constantly be commenting on their positions (politely, of course, though I’m cringing at the number of times he’s likely to use the phrase "my friends" LOL) and showing how his are different- so that they can’t avoid talking about him when they’re forced to respond to that.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.