McCain: Statesman

March 12th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Senator, and presumptive Republican nominee for the presidency, John McCain is leaving the campaign trail for a while: he’ll go to Europe and Israel next week, where he will meet with foreign leaders. This decision will, most likely, create a lot of goodwill in, especially, Europe; where Bush started off on the wrong foot with Europe, McCain seems to understand that one should treat ones allies with respect.

That means that if McCain becomes the next president, it’s likely that Europe will be happy.

Not only that, of course, the trip is also a PR stunt for his campaign: it allows him to “burnish his foreign policy credentials” and it allows him to present himself not just as the Republican nominee, but as the likely next president of the United States and as a Statesman.

Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are bickering, meanwhile the grown-ups are talking to America’s allies.

That’s, at least, the perception he’s trying to create.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. casualobserver
    March 12th, 2008 at 18:53
    Reply | Quote | #1

    MvdG, if you allow me to soften your perjorative from "stunt" to "opportunity", I will agree wholeheartedly with your post.

    And I believe this sort of activity is exactly the kind of "road testing" we ought to be putting our POTUS candidates through.

    If McCain can complete this circuit without a speaking gaffe, I will be more than curious to see what the head-to-head polls reflect towards the end of March.

  2. Jay_C
    March 13th, 2008 at 16:35
    Reply | Quote | #2

    I don’t support him, but it is definately a good move on his campaigns part!

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.