Distancing Yourself… Political Games

March 15th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Via MyDD comes this tidbit: When he decided to run for president, Barack Obama had a conversation with his pastor Jeremiah Wright. Wright told Obama that if he got past the primary process, “he might have to publicly distance himself from me.” Obama replied that “yeah, that might have to happen.”

“I didn’t know.” “I never heard it.” “Not me, I’m innocent.” “Crazy uncle.”

His explanation isn’t much of an explanation at all. His decision to ‘distance’ himself from Wright wasn’t made because Obama felt insulted by Wright’s anti-Semitic and racist comments and sermons, he decided to distance himself from Wright out of political opportunism.

One wonders how pro-Obama bloggers deal with this stuff. To me, it’s pretty obvious that there’s only one way to accept it all, and that’s by believing that black racism isn’t that bad, not that bad at all. If Obama were white, and Wright as well, people everywhere would compare him to Ron Paul and that would have been the end of his campaign. See for instance how Andrew Sullivan responded to the fact that Mormons didn’t allow blacks to become members until 1978, and how he now responds to Wright’s racism.

It’s called being a hypocrite Andrew.

Perhaps there’s something else at work here. Progressive bloggers who support Obama may actually agree with what Wright said (link to Crooks and Liars where Nichole Belle writes that Wright “is not factually wrong in what he said”). Logically, they don’t find what he said to be very offensive. They don’t think it’s insulting, because they say the exact same stuff in private. It’s just that they’re smart enough not to say it in public.

Meanwhile, here’s yet another video of Wright in action. No, I’m sure that Obama never heard this stuff. Nope. Never.

Some quotes (from different sermons):

The government lied about Pearl Harbor. They knew the Japanese were going to attack.

They [the government] purposefully infected African-American men with syphilises.

Waging war for peace, is like raping for virginity.

Black men turning on black men. That is fighting the wrong enemy. You both are the primary targets in an oppressive society that sees both of you as a dangerous threat.

Look at the people standing up, shouting, applauding. Yeah – I’m sure Obama never participated in anything like that, huh?

As I said, the man is distancing himself from Wright out of political opportunism, not because he thinks Wright is wrong and insulting.
Lastly, here’s a funny take on it all (also Ferraro) from Jon Stewart at the Daily Show.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Flo
    March 15th, 2008 at 21:25
    Reply | Quote | #1

    No they wouldn’t,  the real picture is they ATTACKED Paul for no reason.    They had to get rid of Paul to make McCain look better. But it didn’t work.   We don’t want McCain, won’t vote for him. The democrats are in for a surprise come general election because of the republicans that voted for/ or against Hillary, Obama, McCain.    Democrats think they took the country.  Let them continue this non-sense.   McCain took the nomination on PAPER the people don’t want him either.

  2. Interested
    March 16th, 2008 at 04:16
    Reply | Quote | #3

    One wonders how pro-Obama bloggers deal with this stuff. To me, it’s pretty obvious that there’s only one way to accept it all, and that’s by believing that black racism isn’t that bad, not that bad at all.

    Is there one single Presidential Candidate that is still in the running that does not have a supporter that they should run away from but don’t?

    So really, what’s the difference.  And that alone is the bad part with Obama – he is championing change.  But Clinton, McCain – they have many more skeletons in their closets.  When your looking at a billion dollars to get elected, there are plenty of debts to be repaid, and nobody is exempt.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.