Erdogan’s Inflammatory Rhetoric – UPDATE: Court Accepts Case

March 31st, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan continues to use inflammatory language to describe the actions of the opposition and of prosecutors and judges who believe that he and his party are trying to destroy secularism from within. Today Erdogan said, in reference to the case brought before the country’s highest court (to close down the AKP): “this is a hesitant approach. History will never forgive this.”

What’s troubling about Erdogan’s words is that nothing has been decided yet; the judges still have to decide upon the matter. Normally, the Prime Minister (and MPs by the way) don’t comment on pending cases, but Erdogan is in such a great panic that he isn’t able to keep his mouth shut for a while. In fact, today is the day that the court will decide whether it will take on the case or not. In other words, the court won’t decide today whether the AK Parti should be closed or not, it’ll only decide whether it’ll accept the case.
He’s clearly trying to influence the outcome of the case, which isn’t something a PM should do. He should wait… and if the court decides to accept the case and later that the AK Parti should be closed, he can speak out against it, appeal, etc. But until that time, he shouldn’t comment on it.

But he does, and this proves that he truly fears that the court may very well decide to give the prosecutor what he wants. As I understand it, this is quite likely indeed. The AK Parti has tried to destroy secularism from within for months and even years now. They started slowly, but ever since Erdogan won the elections last year he has ignored the opposition. Since those elections, Erdogan has been busy transforming the country, thinking that he’s untouchable.

Today may very well be the day that Erdogan starts to realize he’s not.

UPDATE

From the Hürriyet newspaper (h/t reader Kemal): the court has decided to accept the case. “Turkish top court decided on Monday to accept the lawsuit against the ruling AKP demanding its closure. The lawsuit could continue up to one year, raising concerns over a prolonged political uncertainity. Deputy Chairman of the Court Osman Paksut told reporters the court the decision to take up the case was made unanimously.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Kel Oglan
    March 31st, 2008 at 19:43
    Reply | Quote | #1

    It is true that people should not talk about on-going cases but this rule should apply to ALL.

    At this point no one is doing this I mean NO ONE.
    So it is a bit unfare to ask only Erdogan to keep silent. While others keep talking.

    Is it posible that this story is a bit biased..:-)

    Also I am sure Erdogan is afraid but what?
    Today US Dollar went up about %20 against Turkish YTL.
    About $5 Bln went out of Turkish Markets.
    Perhaps he is thinking “How am I going to clean this up”

    Is it Possible that he is afraid for his country.?

    Or, Is Erdogan just too evil to have such good ideas…

    People you do not agree with do not have to be 100% evil.

  2. ak parti
    April 17th, 2008 at 05:16
    #2
Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.