Obama Leads Comfortably

March 31st, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Barack [...] Obama has expanded his lead over Hillary Rodham Clinton: he’s now leading her 52% against 42%. This after the controversy surrounding his pastor. At the same time, increasingly more senior Democratic figures are calling on Clinton to withdraw from the race. The Democratic establishment, it seems, is uniting.

And not just the establishment of course. The voters themselves are also beginning to back the person they think will be the nominee. For quite a while Obama and Clinton were tied in polls. He’s now – once again – leading very, very comfortably. There are still 42% of Democratic voters who favor Clinton over Obama, so the race isn’t over yet, but a 10% gap is more than Clinton had hoped.

As said, the establishment is uniting behind Obama and calling on Clinton to withdraw from the race. As said yesterday, I’m getting a little bit tired from such calls. She should stay in the race; other voters should be able to speak out as well. Especially because Obama and Clinton are still quite close (in the polls and delegates). Both can count on a lot of support.

Furthermore, a nominee who can’t close the deal, who needs others to drop out in order to close the deal, isn’t a strong nominee. Obama has to be able to close the deal. Telling Clinton to drop out is a sign of weakness and insecurity. And… if people are so insecure about Obama’s ability to close the deal, why would Clinton drop out?

Right.

If Obama is the kind of candidate his supporters and the Democratic elite hope he is, the trend we see right now should continue. He should expand his lead over Clinton, and he should get more support from members of the Democratic elite. If he does that no one will have to ask Clinton to drop out; she’ll drop out because she realizes that Obama can close the deal. And that he has closed it.

It has to be said, by the way, that I think that they’re repeating this “drop out” line constantly in an attempt to influence voters. They don’t really hope and think that she’ll drop out because of what they say; they hope that if they repeat it often enough, quite some Democratic voters will be influenced by it and support for Obama will increase. They are, in other words, playing political games.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. mlk
    March 31st, 2008 at 14:47
    Reply | Quote | #1

    admin: banned for spamming using duplicate accounts

  2. Lindy King
    April 1st, 2008 at 05:35
    Reply | Quote | #2

    I think the issue for many wishing Hillary to step down is because of the negativity and bullying within her campaign.  If she would stop the name calling and just soldier on and work diligently, I think everyone would be fine with it continuing forward. Just today she did it all over again, accusing Obama of trying to kick her out because he doesn’t want half of the country to vote.  It IS laughable and hypocritical. Obama has told her to keep campaigning and she herself was planning to wrap up all the citizen’s voting on Feb 5th.  It was a dishonest attack on Obama, and this is what is upsetting to folks, I believe.

  3. John Q
    April 1st, 2008 at 13:19
    Reply | Quote | #3

    I agree totally, Lindy King.

  4. JudasPriest
    April 1st, 2008 at 14:16
    Reply | Quote | #4

    "I am hundred percent behind my president"
    Hillary R. Clinton.

    no more comments.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.