Two-Bit Security Guard

April 6th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Recently, a Republican – Patrick McHenry – referred to someone working in Iraq as a “two-bit security guard.” Most liberal blogs weighed in on the controversy, arguing that the Representative talked like that about American soldiers. Below the fold a video of “Countdown” with Rachel Meadow: she says that McHenry talked about a US Soldier.

Only problem: he wasn’t a US soldier. But a foreign contractor.

Still a ridiculous think to say of course, but… one would expect journalists to do some better research.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Jim Beam
    April 10th, 2008 at 15:18
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Doesn’t matter, really. Yes, the left took things way out of context, but McHenry should not be calling ANYONE a "two bit", least of which a security guard that inevitably saved his life from missile fire. Actually, now he’s in even hotter water thanks to his Geraldo Rivera style of giving information to the enemy, and the Pentagon’s already stepped in.

    These attacks are not only from the left, we should not be so hard headed to presume that they are- the video actually came from McH’s primary challenger, Lance Sigmon.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.