McCain Camp: Obama’s Hypocritical

April 9th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Senator John McCain argues that Senator Barack Obama talks the polite debate talk, but has yet to walk the walk.

Quite right: “John McCain is making the claim that Barack Obama seems unwilling to personally condemn the controversial remarks of supporters and prominent Democrats after Sen. Obama relied Tuesday on a campaign spokeswoman to criticize Democratic Sen. Jay Rockefeller for a slight against Sen. McCain.”

Here’s what Rockefeller said:

The original remarks were drawn from an interview Rockefeller had Monday with The Charleston Gazette, where he said McCain is too far removed from the repercussions of war to deal with them.

“McCain was a fighter pilot, who dropped laser-guided missiles from 35,000 feet. He was long gone when they hit,” Rockefeller told the newspaper, which published the article on the interview Tuesday.

“What happened when they [the missiles] get to the ground? He doesn’t know. You have to care about the lives of people. McCain never gets into those issues,” he is quoted saying.

Nice.

What’s remarkable about what Rockefeller said isn’t that he tried to insult John McCain – that’s logical in American politics. What is remarkable is that Rockefeller didn’t just insult McCain, but every other fighter pilot the United States had, has and will have in the future.

And all that, at a time that many people are already arguing that the Democrats don’t have a whole lot of respect for the military.

Back to McCain vs. Obama: Obama supporters constantly insult his political opponents, and then a little while later, the Obama camp sends out some memo condemning whatever is the prominent supporter said this time. But seldom do we hear Obama, the person who pretends he is a reformer, do something about this kind of rhetoric, let alone condemn it in the strongest words.

And that is, I think, an important part of Obama’s character. He talks about reforming politics, and the tone of the debate, but he’s not a reformer. It’s as with his pastor, who said outrageous things for years, yet Obama only spoke out against it – more or less – when he was forced to do so by the media and public.

No, nothing new to see here.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. maz hess
    April 9th, 2008 at 11:57
    Reply | Quote | #1

    McCain would be over 80 years old after his second term.

  2. Riaka
    April 9th, 2008 at 12:48
    Reply | Quote | #2

    So typical of Obama when will people see through this man.SHAME ON YOU OBAMA!!!!Its because of men like Mcain you and i are safe and free to live our dreams its because of men like Mcain your free to run as president Mr.Obama! How dare he belittle Mcain or anyone who serves our country so bravely! Why doesnt Obama join the armed forces go fight in Iraq,with our brave men and women then come home and run for President, and have someone belittle his service to our country SHAME ON YOU OBAMA!!! Though i support Hillary i will not stand for this kind of politics! If Hillary loses i will vote for Mcain with him i know me and my children are safe! SHAME SHAME ON OBAMA!

  3. Ilovethiscountry
    April 9th, 2008 at 18:55
    Reply | Quote | #7

    It’s way too hard to believe anyone could even vote for McCain – the guy is dumb, old and the biggest flip flopper in the race.  I understand republicans like dumb dude (Bush, Quayle, Cheney, etc..) but this guy is a total loser and he’s following the steps of a total loser.  I guess you need to be a loser to value this guy.

  4. C Stanley
    April 9th, 2008 at 19:00
    Reply | Quote | #8

    Hmm, seems to be a pattern developing here in the type of critique being offered against McCain. If that’s all you guys have got, then keep it coming- I’m sure that’ll be really helpful to your candidate.

  5. JM
    April 10th, 2008 at 00:46
    Reply | Quote | #9

    If there were journalists still out there, John McSame would not even be in the race.

  6. Aparecido
    April 10th, 2008 at 23:48

    History in the Making: Obama wins the Presidency   http://tardesgrises.wordpress.com/textos-en-ingles/barack-obama/

  7. Skeptical
    April 11th, 2008 at 22:30

    The main reason McCain is making a fuss out of this is to gain the moral high ground.

    Obama claims to be above politics, but this is a small proof that he is a politician like the rest of them.

    McCain is attacking from the higher standing here. McCain personally repudiated comments from an endorser when the endorser kept calling Obama by his full name, Barrack Hussein Obama. Needless to say, his endorser put heavy emphasis on Hussein and immediately switched to the Limbaugh camp when he was repudiated. He personally repudiated his endorser despite the fact that McCain is already in trouble with conservative voters. Can’t get more admirable and politically suicidal than that.

    He expects Obama to do the same for him, which hasn’t happened yet. If it doesn’t happen, this could be a small controversy that shows McCain actually above Obama when it comes to rising above typical character attacks in the general election.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.