Dick Cheney’s Sunglasses

April 11th, 2008 | By: Michael van der Galien

Tags:

Leave a comment

This is fascinating: The White House published a photo of VP Dick Cheney ‘fly fishing.’ Only problem, when one looks at his sunglasses one gets the distinct impression that he seems to believe that fly fishing is done with the help of naked women. That’s a scandal alright!

But, those who thought it was a scandal - and who seemingly should watch a little less porn themselves - have to be disappointed. It isn’t a naked woman. “The image is of the vice president’s hand on his fly rod.”

So close!

Jules Crittenden comments:

Heh heh. He said rod. OK, scandal over.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Interested
    April 11th, 2008 at 11:12
    Reply | Quote | #1

    sure would make fly fishing a lot more fun.   But at the very least, the left should realize that their side has the prostitutes taken up.

  2. David Deal
    April 11th, 2008 at 12:12
    Reply | Quote | #2

    I don’t see a woman, I see Bugs Bunny.

  3. Tom
    April 11th, 2008 at 13:47
    Reply | Quote | #3

    No way that’s a reflection of his hand.  Look at the end of his jacket sleeve and compare to the size of his "hand".  Optically, it doesn’t add up.

  4. Ron
    April 11th, 2008 at 13:49
    Reply | Quote | #4

    Man Haven ‘t you guys seen Stargate! It is an alien from Atzcar, these guys are our best allies, Cheney is just taking him fishing and everyone knows atzcar love fishing. Got to take care of our Allies!!Mr

  5. Dohhhhhhh
    April 11th, 2008 at 14:00
    Reply | Quote | #5

    For cryin’ out loud, give it a rest people. It’s not a gly rod. It’s not a nekkid girl. It’s his fishing guide, Joe Ted Wigglestaff. Everybody who has ever fished with Joe Ted knows he likes to guide his trips nekkid. So, it’s a nekkid guy. No big deal. We always flyfish nekkid on the Snake in the spring. Cheese Louise.

  6. cheney sunglasses
    April 11th, 2008 at 14:04
    #6
  7. cheney photo
    April 11th, 2008 at 18:03
    #7
  8. Chris
    April 11th, 2008 at 20:52
    Reply | Quote | #8

    The angle of the "hand"  is impossible.

    It would have to be a right hand.  How could he reflect the inside of his right hand  out of his left lens which is obviously looking higher than a hand would be.

    As far as his partners hand, on the same note, how would he be reflecting the inside of his partners right hand from a left lens angled in that way?????

    Who knows what it is in this cover-up screwball country.
    Obviously something worth covering up…

  9. Interested
    April 11th, 2008 at 22:31
    Reply | Quote | #9

    Who knows what it is in this cover-up screwball country.
    Obviously something worth covering up…

    Obviously!  (note to self, get more stock in foil companies)

  10. little dick porn
    April 13th, 2008 at 09:01
    #10
Comments are closed.