Perhaps Robert should also – for a change – point out that the treatment of women in early Islam meant a considerable improvement for them at that point in time, that Mohammed was, in that regard and many others, quite progressive and forward thinking, and that the custom of women wearing headscarves / veils is something Muslims adopted from Christians living in the Middle East, some 4 or 5 generations after the creation of this third large monotheistic religion. It would also be worth pointing out that a man inherits twice as much as a women in early Islam, and still in some countries, because men were the ones who worked, who had to take care of their families. As such, he arrangement makes complete sense. O, and it would also be honest to point out that at that time, women did not inherit anything in the Christian world.
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
Comments are closed.
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.
I think that’s a fair enough point because the same is true in Christianity; Christ was pretty much a radical feminist advocate according to the standards of the historical times that He entered into.
But then you’re still left with how many Muslim countries still use those verses as justification for oppression of women vs. how many Western, predominantly Christian nations do so with Bible verses which might support misogynistic practices. And I think you are right, too, Michael, when you point out the relative ages of the two religions- one is, so to speak, in a more primitive form. But where’s the hope that this will change? Just because Christianity did, I don’t think we can assume that Islam will overall become more moderate and aligned with reason in support of human rights. I hope that happens, but just talking about Islam being younger sort of implies that it will undergo a natural evolution and I’m not sure that’s a safe assumption.
Christine, your second paragraph is correct. But that’s not what Robert does. Yet he accuses Muslim bloggers and journalists from being subjective, dishonest, etc.
Isn’t he doing the same as some of the people he quotes, but then from the other point of view?
Yes, I agree with that (can’t say I read enough of him to know how far he goes with that, but I’ve definitely noticed the bias and preconceptions when I do read him.)