<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pentagon Institute: War in Iraq a Debacle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poligazette.com/2008/04/18/pentagon-institute-war-in-iraq-a-debacle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/04/18/pentagon-institute-war-in-iraq-a-debacle/</link>
	<description>Because Common Sense Transcends Distance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:45:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael van der Galien</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/04/18/pentagon-institute-war-in-iraq-a-debacle/comment-page-1/#comment-42499</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael van der Galien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/04/18/pentagon-institute-war-in-iraq-a-debacle/#comment-42499</guid>
		<description>John I&#039;ve updated the post - with my thoughts added to it. 

AS I see it, you&#039;re still being dishonest, or at least not telling your readers what they &lt;em&gt;should&lt;/em&gt; know. You should have changed the very first sentence of your post. And the title. Not because it&#039;s snarky, but because the author is not speaking for the Pentagon.

utsu: of course. We all make mistakes, and we all are subjective to one degree or another. But: what distinguishes honest from dishonest bloggers is the courage to admit you were wrong about something, and to share the facts with your readers. If you make a mistake, fess up. &quot;Someone says it&#039;s being mis-characterized&quot; isn&#039;t &quot;fessing up&quot; or coming clean.

I actually do respect John (a lot), let me therefore say this: you&#039;re also better than this John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John I&#8217;ve updated the post &#8211; with my thoughts added to it. </p>
<p>AS I see it, you&#8217;re still being dishonest, or at least not telling your readers what they <em>should</em> know. You should have changed the very first sentence of your post. And the title. Not because it&#8217;s snarky, but because the author is not speaking for the Pentagon.</p>
<p>utsu: of course. We all make mistakes, and we all are subjective to one degree or another. But: what distinguishes honest from dishonest bloggers is the courage to admit you were wrong about something, and to share the facts with your readers. If you make a mistake, fess up. &#8220;Someone says it&#8217;s being mis-characterized&#8221; isn&#8217;t &#8220;fessing up&#8221; or coming clean.</p>
<p>I actually do respect John (a lot), let me therefore say this: you&#8217;re also better than this John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: utsu</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/04/18/pentagon-institute-war-in-iraq-a-debacle/comment-page-1/#comment-42491</link>
		<dc:creator>utsu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/04/18/pentagon-institute-war-in-iraq-a-debacle/#comment-42491</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sheesh, Michael. You are better than this&quot;

Yes, but he has weaknesses just like any writer on the net. IMO, some of his opinions and stances have come from a spite of scepticism, and some have come out of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Sheesh, Michael. You are better than this&quot;</p>
<p>Yes, but he has weaknesses just like any writer on the net. IMO, some of his opinions and stances have come from a spite of scepticism, and some have come out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cole</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/04/18/pentagon-institute-war-in-iraq-a-debacle/comment-page-1/#comment-42476</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/04/18/pentagon-institute-war-in-iraq-a-debacle/#comment-42476</guid>
		<description>You didn&#039;t even read my post, did you?  You just sort of linked it from memeorandum, right?  You clearly didn&#039;t pay attention to my linking to the pdf of it so people could read it themselves, or where I discussed the Rumsfeld small forces aspect (discussed on page 6-7 of the actual report).  Not to mention it would be kinda silly for me to say I was &quot;right all along&quot; about Iraq when I supported the war for three years.  Sheesh, Michael.  You are better than this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You didn&#8217;t even read my post, did you?  You just sort of linked it from memeorandum, right?  You clearly didn&#8217;t pay attention to my linking to the pdf of it so people could read it themselves, or where I discussed the Rumsfeld small forces aspect (discussed on page 6-7 of the actual report).  Not to mention it would be kinda silly for me to say I was &quot;right all along&quot; about Iraq when I supported the war for three years.  Sheesh, Michael.  You are better than this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
