PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.











Talking about dishonesty:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4i34_lZ7R4Get over it…..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4i34_lZ7R4
Judas,
No, No, No. Michael does not like things that put HRC in anything that may be construed a bad light.
Which means no facts, no proof, no nothing that displays things that she has said or done. You need to cherry pick out the positive things for example
she was against the war before obama was.
well darn, okay not that one.
she has been to Bosnia – ran under sniper fire
okay not that one either.
She was always against Nafta.
shucks, nope
She stands for something
- okay got to stop laughing here.
The division in the party isn’t the candidates’ fault – they’re doing what candidates do. It isn’t the voters’ fault – they’re allowed to be divided. Democracy is a good thing, but too little in this primary has been about democracy. The DNC has caused it, with not only this FL and MI nightmare, but what Dean is doing right now, in trying to stifle the voices of the remaining voters. The media is doing it, by taking sides, slanting coverage, and focusing almost exclusively on rubbish. And the powerful democratic political action groups and other organizations, like moveon.org, dailykos, democraticundergroud, etc. are doing it, by only furthering the agenda of half the party and spitting in the face of the other half. Folks, remember these are the very people who keep saying this primary is divisive and must be ended! NO, THEY DON’T DECIDE ELECTIONS, WE DO! If we give our power to them, we’ll never get it back! Obama can dish it out, but he sure can’t take it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JNq7-aNIiM Listen to Richardson at around 2:00 min. Not to mention Obama’s a hypocrite: http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/obamas_oil_spill.html She’s been getting hammered at all the debates, and suddenly Obama gets an equal amount of tough questions and the whining is deafening.
She’s been getting hammered at all the debates, and suddenly Obama gets an equal amount of tough questions and the whining is deafening.
Yeah, and I’m dating a playboy model. please.
what do you think is going to happen if – by some serious mental lapse – she gets the Dem nomination and is faced by an opponent that does not treat her with kid gloves? when she’s held accountable for all of her laughable experience.
what then? Bill going to step in more? more Vast right – or left – wing conspiracies? more, "That’s the way it happened" moments? More I’ll take that call at 3am, just don’t hold me to my word at 11pm cause i’m tired?
You have some serious self-thinking to do if you think she can handle the office.
Yes, Sen. Obama has discovered that when the going gets tough, the "old style" politics suit just fine, thank you.