Padre Pio’s Body on Display

April 24th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

CNN reports that ‘[t]he body of Padre Pio, a hugely popular 20th century Italian saint, went on public display Thursday in a southern Italian town where thousands gathered to pray.’ Pio died in 1968 when he was 81 years old. He was ‘a mystic monk who many Catholic faithful believe bore “stigmata,” or wounds like those Jesus suffered at his crucifixion, on his hands and feet.’

In the end, he (whose original name was Francesco Forgione) was made a saint in 2002.

Cardinal Jose Saraiva Martins, head of the Vatican’s sainthood office, lead an open-air Mass for thousands of faithful before the unveiling of the saint’s body in a church in San Giovanni Rotondo, where the saint had lived.

“Today, we venerate his body, opening a particularly intense period of pilgrimage,” Saraiva Martins said. “This body is here, but Padre Pio is not only a corpse. Looking at his remains we remember all the good that he has made.”

As the article at CNN explains, Padre Pio is one of the most ‘popular’ saints in Italy, and perhaps even in the world. He had and continues to have an enormous following. Church officials expect some 15,000 ‘people to pay their respects to Padre Pio on the first day of the viewing.’

Padre Pio had a huge public following in life, as in death, and his beatification and canonization ceremonies drew hundreds of thousands of people to the Vatican.

For decades, though, many in the Vatican were uneasy about his popularity and scorned him, doubting that his wounds were real and that mystical virtues attributed to him were authentic. He was barred for years from saying Mass in public, even as his following grew immensely.

‘Since the unearthing in March, the body has been prepared for public viewing in the crypt of the Santa Maria delle Grazie church in San Giovanni Rotondo, a town near the Adriatic in southern Puglia.’

The body is in good condition, and there are no signs of ’stigmata on his limbs.’ As of yet, ‘[i]t is not yet known when the body will be reburied.’

Although I personally don’t consider the ’sainting’ of anyone a good thing from a religious perspective, I do think that people should do whatever helps them grow spiritually in this regard. From a religious perspective, they should only keep in mind that the so-called saints were human beings, just like them, and that they shouldn’t make the mistake to worship their fellow men.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. C Stanley
    April 24th, 2008 at 21:31
    Reply | Quote | #1

    From a religious perspective, they should only keep in mind that the so-called saints were human beings, just like them, and that they shouldn’t make the mistake to worship their fellow men.
    Some people do take the veneration too far, but veneration itself is not worship. The Church teaches us that the saints were imperfect, but that they gave testimony to Christ through their actions and we honor them for that reason. We’re all actually called to be saints, by imitating Christ.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.