Hizbullah Prepares for War

April 27th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Nice: a couple of years ago Hizbullah and Israel went to war with each other. The result was that the Shi’ite terrorist organization was severely weakened and had lost many of its fighters. Aside from that, though, the organization had also proved that it could fight back against Israel and that Olmer is a weak leader; he could’ve crushed Hizbullah, but instead he decided to give in to international pressure, and let Hizbullah off the hook. Hizbullah suffered, but it also learned an important lesson; next time, it would be even stronger, and better prepared.

Now “an Observer investigation has discovered that this covert organisation is quietly but steadily replacing its dead and redoubling its recruitment efforts in anticipation of a new, and even more brutal, conflict.”

Hizbollah has embarked on a major expansion of its fighting capability and is now sending hundreds, if not thousands, of young men into intensive training camps in Lebanon, Syria and Iran to ready itself for war with Israel. ‘It’s not a matter of if,’ says one fighter. ‘It’s a matter of when Sayed Hasan Nasrallah [Hizbollah chief] commands us.’

The group’s policy of refusing to discuss military matters extends to the highest levels. In speeches and rare interviews, Nasrallah refuses to answer even the simplest questions about the military wing, never referring even to the fact that his eldest son, Hadi, was a fighter himself. Life as a Hizbollah fighter is anonymous until death. But meetings with fighters, activists, Lebanese security officials, the UN peacekeepers along the border and residents of south Lebanon and the southern suburbs of Beirut, where the group is most active, offered a glimpse inside the workings of a group rarely open to outsiders. None of the sources within the group can be named – Hizbollah has barred members from speaking with the Western media since the mysterious death of a top commander, Imad Mughniyeh, in a Damascus car bomb…

‘The most important thing is to never talk,’ says one fighter, who agreed to speak about the group without revealing his name or specific duties inside ‘the Islamic Resistance of Lebanon’, as the military wing of Hizbollah is known. ‘From the moment we begin our training, we are told two things: never disobey an order and never talk about the resistance. Hizbollah is not a job, it is not a family. It is a mix of religion, honour, dignity and discipline. It is my life.’

But what is becoming more obvious, even as Hizbollah tries to hide it, is that the group has embarked on an unprecedented build-up of men, equipment and bunker-building in preparation for the war that almost everyone – Lebanese and Israeli – considers inevitable. ‘The villages in the south are empty of men,’ said one international official. ‘They are all gone, training in Bekaa, Syria and Iran.’…

The initial training and selection of recruits is done in Lebanon, with Iran preferred for training on specialities – use of certain weapons, RPGs and anti-tank missiles – that require firing live rounds. ‘But mostly the training in Iran is in theoretical things: philosophy, religion. The best training for fighting is done here in Lebanon,’ said a fighter. ‘We are so close to Israel here that our training becomes real.’

Israel says that the new recruitment offensive is a result of the war two years ago. Many Hizbullah fighters were killed in that conflict. However, according to Hizbullah and US sources, the reasons for the recruitment are that Hizbullah is considered to be quite an effective organization – so many people want to fight for it – and that the war in 2006 has given Hizbullah leaders the impression that they are more than terrorists; they can also function as a conventional military force. In other words; the recruitment efforts are doubled because Hizbullah leaders believe that their organization can function as a regular army in a conflict.

Israel, then, should prepare for another major regional war. The stronger Hizbullah becomes the more likely it is that the Shi’ite terrorists will open a massive attack against Israel. And once that happens, well, there’s only one adequate response possible: squash the terrorists.

The war in 2006 was a massive propaganda victory for Hizbullah. Sure it lost a couple of hundreds of fighters, but the losses were nothing compared to the gains. Israel can’t allow that to happen again.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Chet Bowen
    April 29th, 2008 at 21:39
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Israel should go ahead and preeminently destroy Hizbullah before they get any stronge.

  2. tima green
    May 15th, 2008 at 14:45
    Reply | Quote | #2

    indeed, hizbullah is well prepared to destroy israel in the next war, and i promise readers that they are going to fight inside phalastine…

  3. sara
    May 15th, 2008 at 14:51
    Reply | Quote | #3

    i want to say that hizbullah won the battles against the strongest army in the region in july 2006.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.