ElectionSnark goes missing for 3 days. Clinton and Obama campaigns both demand that the other apologize. McCain campaign manager jumps up and down in tie-dye clown suit screaming, “We Are Still Here, Dammit!”
Even stories headlined to be about McCain are mostly about Obama.
Obama and Clinton both win 4 half-delegates in primary voting on Guam. Entire nation half-cares. Almost. Plus or minus0.1%.
Clinton campaign promises voting rights for Guam on day before Guam primary. Clinton campaign swears it is not pandering and, by the way, the sky is not blue.
Clinton considers “nuclear option”. Choice of whether to target Iran or the Obama campaign remains undetermined.
Some bloggers are bored of talking about the perpetual Clinton campaign, so they write more posts about it.
1968, 1972, 1976, and now 1988 all campaign for status as the “official analogy for the endless 2008 election”. 1988’s new rise may be associated with its removal of Mark Penn as “strategic consultant”.
Bill Ayers hates the U.S. flag. The novelty of an anti-American recycled hippie with university tenure. Wow. That’s like the novelty of a black crow.
Anti-Obamites continue to find outrageous verbal gaffes. Next up: Obama states “the sun rises in the east” and insults the west, north, AND south!
PastorGate continues to plague Obama, causing him to still lead the race.
New York Times editorial demands detailed medical information on McCain to use as additional basis for its strong but of course completely objective and non-partisan opposition to him.
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
Comments are closed.
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.
Yeah, that identifies with the multitude of folks that paid their own way. YAF – Yet Another Fabrication by Clinton.