Hillary and Bill’s Wounded Pride

May 22nd, 2008 By: Arvak | Tags:

FiveThirtyEight has a thoroughly persuasive analysis of Hillary Clinton’s nomination prospects, and they are beyond dismal. In fact, they prove that the whole question about Florida and Michigan is “much ado about nothing”:

If Florida and Michigan are not seated, Obama has effectively already clinched under this scenario. We have him picking up 41 pledged delegates and 23 add-on delegates between now and the 23rd, or 64 total, slightly more than the 60 he needs even without any further superdelegate endorsements. But even under Clinton’s best-case Michigan/Florida scenario, with the delegations fully seated, Obama will need only 1-2 superdelegate commitments per day to clinch by June 21.

The very last line in the table might be the one to pay the most attention to. If the Florida and Michigan delegations are seated as half-delegates, Obama needs only about 10 percent of the outstanding superdelegates in order to clinch the nomination; Clinton would need 90 percent. If Florida and Michigan are fully seated, Obama needs about 20 percent of the remaining undeclared delegates; Clinton needs roughly 80 percent.

If there is no prospect for success in pressing the Florida/Michgan question all the way ot the convention, the question then is: What can possibly explain Hillary’s continued dogged and even outright hysterical rhetorical pressing?

One common explanation is that Hillary is trying to force her way on to the VP ticket by accumulating enough votes to put party elites at her side to bend Obama to her will. But the blunt reason that Obama won’t do it is Bill Clinton. It would be bad enough to have and endlessly scheming Hillary in the VP office — wags have facetiously suggested that Obama would require a veritable army of food tasters. But the addition of former president Bill Clinton — an ex-president who has never fully accepted the “ex-” part of that title — would constitute a second competing power center in the West Wing. The Obama administration would be fractured irreparably into not two but three parts from day one. Only a willingness to embrace the inevitability of a stunted and ineffective administration would drive Obama to accept such a scenario and there is no evidence that he is stupid enough not to see the set-up.  Even Clinton’s own advisers have reportedly concluded that Obama will not in fact offer Clinton the VP spot.

FiveThirtyEight highlights a more likely alternative: That the Clinton campaign has long since stopped being motivated by calculation and has become nothing more than a tantrum:

Increasingly, I am beginning to side with Jonathan Chait: we should stop trying to interpret the Clintons’ actions as those of a rational campaign. This is not just about Florida and Michigan. It’s about kindergate and Jesse Jackson and “hard working” and a whole series of actions that were at best politically tone-deaf and at worst almost willfully self-destructive. The story of the Clintons is not that of a campaign that will debase itself in order to win. Rather, it’s one of a campaign whose sense of self-pride had become so swollen as to obscure its path to victory.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Tully
    May 22nd, 2008 at 20:51
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Very nice analysis of the primary numerics. Too early to put much if any faith in November predicitions.

    What can possibly explain Hillary’s continued dogged and even outright hysterical rhetorical pressing?

    TANSTAAFL. She isn’t staying in the race for the exercise. Her actions have a purpose. I still say there’s more than one (rational) agenda at work behind the ongoing Clinton campaign and people keep missing that, which distorts the interpretation of any single-agenda-based analysis considerably. But my predictions were made weeks ago and will stand or fall on their own. If they’re wrong I’ll still own up to them.

    100% agree that Clinton on the ticket as VP would be a bad idea for Obama, and no friend would advise him to take her.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.