Comments on: I’ve Heard it Say Via a Good Friend, of a Friend, of a Friend, of a… http://www.poligazette.com/2008/06/02/ive-heard-it-say-via-a-good-friend-of-a-friend-of-a-friend-of-a/ Because Common Sense Transcends Distance Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:56:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: R U N Idiot http://www.poligazette.com/2008/06/02/ive-heard-it-say-via-a-good-friend-of-a-friend-of-a-friend-of-a/comment-page-1/#comment-54657 R U N Idiot Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:40:47 +0000 http://poligazette.com/2008/06/02/ive-heard-it-say-via-a-good-friend-of-a-friend-of-a-friend-of-a/#comment-54657 Larry Johnson didn't "admit" anything.  He reported, in straightforward fashion, what he had learned.  Unlike most of these dunces that call themselves reporters, he didn't make shit up--he said what he knew, and what he did not know.  He told us what he had HEARD.  And he told us from where he got it.  Not a simple, Couric-like "some sources say"--he said they were Republicans, not Democrats, who were talking about this with him.   He didn't try to hide anything, or "admit" anything.  Starting out with that line of bullshit tells us exactly what your perspective is--you're hardly impartial, indeed, you could be called, quite reasonably, an Obama Shill.    Roger Stone, the rightwing nitwit and dirty trickster, the guy behind the screwing of Dan Rather with real documents, warped beyond recognition,  and the individual  who told the media that Elliot Spitzer was trafficking in escorts months before it was publicly revealed, <strong>has said this tape EXISTS</strong>.  Now, you may not like that source, but that bum has a very long and pretty scary track record of being CORRECT when he says something.  Of course, the way Team Obama handles this is to get a whole load of "followers" out there on the internet to make fun of the messenger.  Well, that won't change facts.  The derision against Johnson is almost pathological.  And the refutation of the TRANSCRIPT of this "hoax" tape (Why'd he, as opposed to Whitey) borders on hysteria--why is Team Obama refuting the CONTEXT of the words of a tape they say does not exist?  Hmmmmm.  The energy spent in attempting to debunk this story, accompanied by a half dozen "explanations," from "no tape" to "Why'd he" suggests that there IS a tape, of a panel discussion in a public setting,  Michelle and Louis are on it, and they're pissed.  How are they going to mitigate this when the tape does come out in October, and it's too late?  Will they blame "Whitey" for not wanting to vote for a guy who uses his wife and Antonin Rezko as cut-outs to cement his relationship with the vote-getting Farrakhan?  A vote for Obama in the primary is a vote for McCain in the general.  Obama may be the nominee, but he'll NEVER be the President.  He will be beaten soundly, roundly, and sideways,  like a rented mule.  He's a shitty "first."  He doesn't have the political and life experience, the political background, the clean political hands, or the spouse that doesn't look perpetually angered, like she wants to shoot you and leave you for dead, to make the gig work.       What he does have is a sleazy lobbyist running his campaign, a bucketload of questionable associates, connections with the nuclear power, coal and defense industries, a willingness to steal ideas and credit from others, and an inability to speak extemporaneously that is masked by an astounding talent when the teleprompter is working.  We do NOT "deserve" him--we deserve a QUALIFIED President for a change.  Larry Johnson didn’t "admit" anything.  He reported, in straightforward fashion, what he had learned.  Unlike most of these dunces that call themselves reporters, he didn’t make shit up–he said what he knew, and what he did not know.  He told us what he had HEARD.  And he told us from where he got it.  Not a simple, Couric-like "some sources say"–he said they were Republicans, not Democrats, who were talking about this with him.   He didn’t try to hide anything, or "admit" anything.  Starting out with that line of bullshit tells us exactly what your perspective is–you’re hardly impartial, indeed, you could be called, quite reasonably, an Obama Shill.   

Roger Stone, the rightwing nitwit and dirty trickster, the guy behind the screwing of Dan Rather with real documents, warped beyond recognition,  and the individual  who told the media that Elliot Spitzer was trafficking in escorts months before it was publicly revealed, has said this tape EXISTS.  Now, you may not like that source, but that bum has a very long and pretty scary track record of being CORRECT when he says something. 

Of course, the way Team Obama handles this is to get a whole load of "followers" out there on the internet to make fun of the messenger.  Well, that won’t change facts.  The derision against Johnson is almost pathological.  And the refutation of the TRANSCRIPT of this "hoax" tape (Why’d he, as opposed to Whitey) borders on hysteria–why is Team Obama refuting the CONTEXT of the words of a tape they say does not exist? 

Hmmmmm.  The energy spent in attempting to debunk this story, accompanied by a half dozen "explanations," from "no tape" to "Why’d he" suggests that there IS a tape, of a panel discussion in a public setting,  Michelle and Louis are on it, and they’re pissed. 

How are they going to mitigate this when the tape does come out in October, and it’s too late?  Will they blame "Whitey" for not wanting to vote for a guy who uses his wife and Antonin Rezko as cut-outs to cement his relationship with the vote-getting Farrakhan? 
A vote for Obama in the primary is a vote for McCain in the general.  Obama may be the nominee, but he’ll NEVER be the President.  He will be beaten soundly, roundly, and sideways,  like a rented mule. 
He’s a shitty "first."  He doesn’t have the political and life experience, the political background, the clean political hands, or the spouse that doesn’t look perpetually angered, like she wants to shoot you and leave you for dead, to make the gig work.       What he does have is a sleazy lobbyist running his campaign, a bucketload of questionable associates, connections with the nuclear power, coal and defense industries, a willingness to steal ideas and credit from others, and an inability to speak extemporaneously that is masked by an astounding talent when the teleprompter is working.  We do NOT "deserve" him–we deserve a QUALIFIED President for a change. 

]]> By: DID MICHELLE OBAMA USE THE WORD “WHITEY”? « MEANINGFUL DISTRACTION http://www.poligazette.com/2008/06/02/ive-heard-it-say-via-a-good-friend-of-a-friend-of-a-friend-of-a/comment-page-1/#comment-54367 DID MICHELLE OBAMA USE THE WORD “WHITEY”? « MEANINGFUL DISTRACTION Mon, 02 Jun 2008 17:23:44 +0000 http://poligazette.com/2008/06/02/ive-heard-it-say-via-a-good-friend-of-a-friend-of-a-friend-of-a/#comment-54367 [...] Larry Johnson, who admits he has not seen the tape, is now saying that Louis Farrakhan was present when Michelle uttered her remarks. Possibly related [...] [...] Larry Johnson, who admits he has not seen the tape, is now saying that Louis Farrakhan was present when Michelle uttered her remarks. Possibly related [...]

]]> By: Rich Horton http://www.poligazette.com/2008/06/02/ive-heard-it-say-via-a-good-friend-of-a-friend-of-a-friend-of-a/comment-page-1/#comment-54352 Rich Horton Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:24:25 +0000 http://poligazette.com/2008/06/02/ive-heard-it-say-via-a-good-friend-of-a-friend-of-a-friend-of-a/#comment-54352 Johnson is such a tease. Just a thought: If no such tape <em>could</em> exist (i.e. because Michelle Obama never sat on such and panel and never said any such thing), wouldn't we have heard from team Obama already?  They haven't been sy about screaming bloody murder in the past.  Johnson is such a tease.

Just a thought: If no such tape could exist (i.e. because Michelle Obama never sat on such and panel and never said any such thing), wouldn’t we have heard from team Obama already?  They haven’t been sy about screaming bloody murder in the past. 

]]>