Debunking the ‘Whitey’ Video Rumors

June 6th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Jim Geraghty does a marvelous job debunking the rumors about a supposed video on which Michelle Obama can allegedly be seen and heard insulting white people. What has Jim found? Well, that the rumors spread by Larry Johnson of No Quarter bare close resemblance to… a thriller novel.

The book: Stephen Frey’s The Power Broker, published in 2006 by Ballantine Books. 

Jim’s last words on this subject:

Why is a conservative blogger putting this much effort into dispelling a rumor that, on paper at least, would hurt Obama? Because those who prefer a president besides Obama should not go through the summer and fall convinced that a magic-bullet devastating tape is going to appear as an October surprise to save the day.

Also, there are a lot of good reasons to vote against Barack Obama; but what people claim Michelle Obama says on a tape that no one can produce and no one has seen isn’t one of them.

Quite right.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. PatHMV
    June 6th, 2008 at 20:42
    Reply | Quote | #1

    And yet people keep talking about the likely-fictious tape. This was the most successful plant of a non-story as I’ve seen in a long time. Hundreds of journalists and  bloggers have covered it and brought it to the point where the candidate was bullied into answering it (a really stupid move on Obama’s part).

    It’s like the old LBJ story, where he told his campaign guy he wanted to start a rumor that his opponent was a pig-fucker. The campaign guy tells the President that nobody would believe such a rumor. The President said: "Of course not. I don’t need to make anybody believe it; I just want to make the son-of-a-bitch DENY it."

  2. Juan
    June 9th, 2008 at 21:06
    Reply | Quote | #2
Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.