Comments on: Kucinich Introduces Impeachment Articles against President Bush

By: utsu

utsu — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:19:44 +0000

"And Utsu what was that Ghandi said “Eye for an eye leaves everyone blind”"

Yeah, whatever, pseudo-sagacious fool said something in the past and now you are trying to "get" me with the quip in question.

I don’t care for the reasons for this case. I care about whether impeaching offenses have been made. I wouldn’t care if Hitler showed up with this case in order to get rid of a pro-Israeli president in preparation of a second holocaust. If there is something to impeach for, impeach away. If revenge is the rationale for engaing justice, then so be it – as long as you always seek to serve it, no matter the defendant.

By: T.L.C.

T.L.C. — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:42:15 +0000

I watched C-span while they read the charges against the Bush/Cheney show last night. If half of those charges are correct, why, indeed, should he be allowed to stroll out of office without a backward glance. You’ve got to be kidding me. If the charges are correct, he is guilty of some serious stuff. Anyone that would look the other way once this has been brought to light, certainly needs to get a reality check.

By: Edna

Edna — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:05:51 +0000

I’ve been shouting for years that Bush should be impeached. The article asks what the point is of doing so at this late date. Let me answer: it wouldn’t matter if Bush only had one day or one hour left in his administration, impeaching him would still be critically important for the health of our country. Why? Because the foundation of this country and its true greatness is the rule of law. Bush has consistency placed himself above the rule of law and flouted it with blatent disregard. It is therefore our DUTY to impeach, thereby affirming the absolute sanctity of rule of law and the constitution to our democracy.

By: articles on group building

articles on group building — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:04:08 +0000

[...] [...]

By: what is the purposes of p e

what is the purposes of p e — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:22:49 +0000

[...] or any other act shall be used for publicity or propaganda purposes within the united states, …http://poligazette.com/2008/06/10/kucinich-introduces-impeachment-articles-against-president-bush/The Cutting Edge NewsThe Cutting Edge News Filed under: Iran, Technology, Middle East, US, Peace, [...]

By: Interested

Interested — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:03:05 +0000

Essentially anything from the bird flu to a conflict with Iran could cause "Dubya" to hijack the elections and appoint himself Dictator. I say impeach him while we have the chance.

Special on Foil – isle 4

By: CoCo

CoCo — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:16:54 +0000

President Bush will leave office in January of 2009. That means that he has only seven months left, five of which he will have little to nothing to do. …seriously? Have you not been paying attention to Bush and his newest moves to start war with Iran?…and have you not heard of 2 little known Presidential Directives that Bush and Chaney slipped into law without congress’s knowledge or approval, called NSPD 51 and HSPD 20? These 2 National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directives broaden the definition of what could be called a national emergency and they permit the President to take power over all essential functions of the government (all the way down to tribal levels) and to take over the essential functions of any companies he sees fit. He can do all this without the permission of the Congress. Essentially anything from the bird flu to a conflict with Iran could cause "Dubya" to hijack the elections and appoint himself Dictator. I say impeach him while we have the chance.

By: Interested

Interested — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:00:23 +0000

Then again, you could say that about a lot of the bills in Congess.

You could say that about this Congress period – under Dem leadership it went from bad to much worse.

By: Michael Merritt

Michael Merritt — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 20:42:20 +0000

I think he knows it’s only a symbolic gesture at this point, but consider all the paper he must be wasting making a useless gesture.

Then again, you could say that about a lot of the bills in Congess.

By: Chris

Chris — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 20:03:19 +0000

That Chris above wasn’t this Chris. Neither this proposed impeachment of GW nor the impeachment of Clinton appeal to me.

And Utsu what was that Ghandi said “Eye for an eye leaves everyone blind”