If you’re a blogger, or a blogreader who wants to become a blogger, and willing to write for PoliGazette – a place where people of all stripes come together – contact me. We’re looking for fresh blood.
Don’t hesitate; we’ll be glad to have you join the team. We’re an ambitious bunch, hoping to turn PoliGazette into one of the internationally leading news and opinion websites (although with an emphasis on the US).
In the coming weeks we hope to add a significant option to PoliGazette, the website. More about that later; for now, it’s a surprise.
But, if things work out, it will be quite cool and greatly enhance the ability for readers to participate in the political debate and to interact with each other… and our bloggers.
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
Comments are closed.
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.
Fresh blood? Without other precision?
If this proposition valid for socialists, or only for the conservatives and the centrists?
Why an emphasis on the US? Both you and Claudia are European…
I think it’s because Michael is an American studies student.
Careful, Michael, I might take you up on that.
Or at least I would, if I was younger and didn’t have a family. And a more studious person.
You are pathetic boy.
You who insult our nation for the glory of a love for a 2 star colonel.
Get YOUR facts.
Out of ‘blood’?
Vampire.
Managing Director M. v. d. G..))))
HHHHHHAAAAAAhhhhhhhha
Isil
Your Ghost
Out of ‘blood’? Vampire. Managing Director M. v. d. G..)))) HHHHHHAAAAAAhhhhhhhha Isil Your Ghost
Isil; we need blood. Lots of it. I’ve been on a diet for the last four months, so I’m constantly hungry; instead of food, I drink blood. It works miracles!
A.A.B.: Michael Merritt answer that question
It’s my specialty
Lucrece: good question. This is the guideline; moderates and centrists are welcome, but we want to have more; moderately liberals and moderately conservatives are also more than welcome. Socialists are – albeit in a European sense so less radical than most Americans think when they hear the word – a bit far to the left. Above all, one has to respect others, who hold different opinions. True ideologues – whether they are socialist, or michelle malkin etc. – can’t.
A bit far to the left? Really? Why am I not surprised?
Respect others? Certainly:
"What do you want, we must still getting used to treat everyone fairly. When peoples oppose, I say convictions against convictions, yes, but sectarianism against sectarianism, no. (Qu’est-ce que vous voulez, il faut quand même s’habituer à traiter chacun avec équité. Quand les gens s’opposent, moi je dis convictions contre convictions oui, mais sectarisme contre sectarisme, non.)"
François Mitterrand, TV interview, September 17, 1987.
Are you overdrawn at the blood bank again, Michael? Ysk tsk!