GOP Insiders Not Happy With McCain Game Plan

July 2nd, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The Politico reports that increasingly more GOP insiders ‘are getting restless.’ They are ‘frustrated by what they view as inconsistent messaging, sluggish fundraising and an organization that is too slow to take shape.’ As a result these officials are ‘growing increasingly uneasy about the direction of the McCain presidential campaign.’

Politico talked to 16 Republican insiders and all of them agree that McCain is running a horrible campaign, in just about every respect.

“It’s not just message or not having just one single meta-theme to compete with Obama,” said a veteran Republican strategist with close ties to McCain’s top advisers. “It’s not just fundraising, which is mediocre. And it’s not even just organization, which is [just] starting or nonexistent in many states.”

“McCain’s campaign seems not to have a game plan. I don’t see a consistent message,” said Ed Rollins, a veteran of Republican presidential campaigns. “As someone who has run campaigns, this campaign is not running smoothly. But none of this matters if they get their act together.”

The main problem with this campaign is that it is “aimless.” One gets the impression, GOP insiders say, that McCain isn’t running on a clear platform, there’s no one, clear message. This while Republicans have learned over the years that, in order to win, you need a very clear and simple message. And you need to repeat this message time and again. Everyone that’s part of your campaign has to spread this one-sentence message. It has to be repeated so often, and it has to be so catchy, that voters can’t forget it about even when they sleep. When sleeping, you need them to wake up the next morning with that message on their lips.

Another major problem is that McCain et al. aren’t using the grassroots as well as they should. In fact, the NRA and other grassroots organizations have largely been ignored. This while Obama’s main strength is exactly that; grassroots. If McCain doesn’t act now, he’ll be destroyed in November, simply because Obama will have tens of thousands, millions even, of grassroots doing most of the (dirty) work for him.

Furthermore, according to these strategists, McCain doesn’t understand that if he wants to win, he has to exploit his own strengths and Obama’s weaknesses. He has to point them out time and again. His campaign has to come up with a clear narrative of Obama. Thus far it has not done so. This even though McCain’s national campaign started four months before Obama’s.

Personally I believe that the strategists are right… but only to a degree:

1. Grassroots. They’re right about this.

2. Defining Obama / Attacking him. They’re not right about this I believe. Frankly, Obama can get away with anything, and will get away with anything, no matter what. The reason is that he has presented himself as a different kind of politician, who offers something most other politicians do not offer (change, hope and unity). Whether that’s true or not is irrelevant; it’s what most voters now believe, and it’s what they will continue to believe for years.

3. Defining himself. They are correct about this one. What Republicans generally don’t seem to understand is that when your opponent convinces people he’s different, and that he offers hope, change and unity to them, you can’t beat him on the same old agenda, nor by simply attacking him. That doesn’t work. You also have to offer hope, change and unity, albeit different kinds. McCain should not spend too much time attacking Obama; he should spend his time coming up with a clear message of hope and change and sharing it with the voters.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. maz hess
    July 3rd, 2008 at 10:35
    Reply | Quote | #1

    This campaign dear mccain will be your worst nightmare.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.