A Partisan Divide in the Blogosphere

July 4th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

This paper confirms my own feelings and suspicions about the blogosphere and about blogreaders. Centrists and moderates don’t read blogs as much as liberals and conservatives do, and those liberals and conservatives visit only left-wing / right-wing blogs. People want to read opinions they agree with.

This blog, as is TMV (the paper comes via them), is an exception in the blogosphere; most other blogs are highly partisan. Whenever you visit those blogs, you know what their take on the news will be. Yet, time and again, people visit them. Why? Because they enjoy reading opinions they agree with. The far majority of blogreaders – you all excluded of course – do not want their opinions and views to be challenged; they want them to be confirmed. Time and again.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. KevinH
    July 4th, 2008 at 19:46
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Agreeing with you all the time would be so boring Michael ;)

  2. Chuck Norton
    July 5th, 2008 at 05:16
    Reply | Quote | #2

    When I want a god laugh, or I want to see what lies or rewrites of history the far left comes up with next, I go to DailyKOS, Democrat Underground, and Huff Post. Huff post though in fairness has a few honest writers.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.