McCain is applauded at the NAACP

July 17th, 2008 By: admin | Tags:

On Wednesday at the NAACP, a pro-Obama crowd received a surprising speech from Senator John McCain.

McCain began the speech with praises for his rival and the crowd cheered him for his honorable address to Barack Obama.

McCain focused a portion of his speech on education reform saying “Education reform has long been a priority of the NAACP, and for good reason. For all the best efforts of teachers and administrators, the worst problems of our public school system are often found in black communities, [...] Black and Latino students are among the most likely to drop out of high school. African-Americans are also among the least likely to go on to college. After decades of hearing the same big promises from the public education establishment, and seeing the same poor results, it is surely time to shake off old ways and to demand new reforms. That isn’t just my opinion; it is the conviction of parents in poor neighborhoods across this nation who want better lives for their children”

At the end of his speech McCain complimented Barack Obama: “[whatever the outcome], Sen. Obama has achieved a great thing — for himself and for his country — and I thank him for it.”

CNN Video of McCain complimenting Barack Obama.

McCain received a respectful standing ovation for his great speech.

Venitta Barnett, an NAACP member and Obama supporter, said also was glad McCain spoke before the group: “I came, and I was open-minded, and I listened, and I was more surprised that I am open to what he was saying. He is not everything that I heard that he was about. He is more people-oriented, so I am open.”

Gretchen Woods, an undecided voter, said she found McCain’s speech “informative and very interesting.”

“I had intended not to come, but now that I am here and actually heard it, I think I made the right choice to come and hear it,” she said.

“After hearing him today, I may listen to him again.”

Is it surprising that when opposing viewpoints and speeches are heard a feeling of enlightenment occurs?

American voters need to look closer to both candidates critically. Rather than pretending like as if they are part of a team in a football game they should act like they are choosing the best person for a job. They need to act like the boss that interviews a college kid and reads his resume for a job opening.

One of the most important lessons many US Government and Politics teachers tell students is that you should fairly observe both candidates regardless of their party. Such teachers say that you should never vote for your party but for the candidate.

In my case, in a period of months I had visited and read many of the “Issues” and “Policies” section of HillaryClinton.com, BarackObama.com, and JohnMcCain.com. I examined their policies, their promises, their history (or lack thereof), observed their speeches and concluded that Senator John McCain was the more experienced and better informed candidate for president. This doesn’t mean that my conclusion will not change tomorrow and therefore I do not remain “nationalistic” or obsessive about any one candidate.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.