Jindal; A Perfect VP… Or is He?

July 23rd, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Kathleen Parker explains why Bobby Jindal, the Republican governor of Louisiana, would be a great VP choice for John McCain… and why he should not accept a possible offer to become McCain’s running mate.

Jindal is intelligent. He’s a real American conservative. He has charisma. He is young (and “looks even younger”). He has executive experience. He can present himself as a true reformer, and to a degree outsider. A rising Republican star, yet not a WASP; his parents are from India. He converted to Hinduism to Catholicism as a high school student.

But… he has only been governor for a couple of months. For him, it would be best to serve his entire term; it would give him more experience, and a better, stronger record. Additionally, one could argue that he could be a future Republican presidential nominee, not merely a VP candidate. If McCain loses in November – and it is possible – even when Jindal is his running mate, the latter’s career will undoubtedly suffer (at least to a degree, and if he is not able to perform well in debates with Obama’s VP candidate more so).

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Tom
    July 23rd, 2008 at 14:36
    Reply | Quote | #1

    The Exorcist? ;)

    Not the best choice, I would think.

  2. redfish
    July 24th, 2008 at 19:35
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Whenever I see Jindal on TV, he sounds and acts like a used car salesman trying to pitch his party; ‘But wait there’s more, the GOP now has a low-interest rate cashback plan’. I didn’t pay attention enough to know what his policies were, but I really didn’t like listening to him, and don’t understand people who think he has charisma. He needs to stop giving the sales pitch.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.