PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.











When I first saw this, I was certain that it was a YouTube independent video. It’s clever, I’ll give them that, but very juvenile. That’s fine, if you aren’t actually a member of the campaign. I’m all for people using their creativity in this fashion (though I personally think the message is absurd) but it’s not something you do OFFICIALLY. Geez, at the very least, the McCain campaign could have had a surrogate group get this out themselves.
People complain about MoveOn, and I understand (as Jon Stewart said "MoveOn.org, 20 years of making even people that agree with you cringe", but this is absolutely no better. It’s just as transparent and snarky. Again, whatever fills your sails, but it makes the McCain campaign seem more like the daily show than a serious campaign for president.
I’m a registered Republican, but have a hard time embracing McCain. I’m having a hard time getting excited about his positions on many issues and still waiting for him to get me excited about his campaign. This video does the opposite. I wish he would ignore Obama, stop talking badly about him and tell me why he is better suited to be President. Attacking Obama makes him seem petty, juvenile and defeated. Stick with the "conservative" issues and embrace change.. change is good. God knows, we’re all looking forward to it..he should too.
It’s silly, but just watching the Obama campaign’s reaction to it reinforces the point of the video that Obama has no sense of humor and takes himself way too seriously. There will be plenty of time for serious debates after the conventions. Sometimes a well-made satire such as this is worth a thousand policy statements.