Without venturing an opinion on the merits of Techdude’s claims, without knowing if they are well founded or merely the words of a crackpot, I still have to seriously question why some Obama supporters are so desperate to stop these revelations from seeing the light of day. If Techdude’s lying or even if he’s sincere but wrong, other computer forensic experts will definitely unmask him and that will be a boost to their candidate so terribly besmirched by a right wing nut. If he’s telling the truth, would it not behoove Obama’s supporters to examine it and drop their candidate as a fraud and thus follow the American Constitution while saving the US?!?!?
Anyone who has ever read my blog, knows I do not believe Senator Obama is the political Messiah we all have been waiting for. His record in Chicago and in Washington, show me nothing but ineptitude, uncaring elitism and calculated deceit. But, I’ll admit, he’s very photogenic and superb at delivering a well rehearsed speech. Yes, gentle reader, that is just my opinion even if it was formed after a careful analysis of the good Senator’s record and words as a community organizer and as a US Senator. I see no reason to do or preach violence against those who do not share my beliefs, and while I’d be very unhappy were Obama to win the elections… he’d still be my country’s President.
For the rest, please go to: Freedom’s Cost
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
Comments are closed.
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.
